tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: advice for heavy traffic capturing
From: Darren Reed <darrenr () reed wattle id au>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 00:08:36 +1000 (EST)
In some email I received from Loris Degioanni, sie wrote:
Other things: - modern network cards don't almost do buffering. The memory inside the board is usually few KB, and its purpose is providing the space for a packet or two. The actual buffering is done in the RAM of the PC. What determines the card performance is PHY efficiency and PCI bandwidth usage.
Ok, so what do you have to say about NICs that have 128k buffers vs the small buffers on other cards? Darren - This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit https://lists.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
Current thread:
- Re: advice for heavy traffic capturing, (continued)
- Re: advice for heavy traffic capturing Guy Harris (Aug 08)
- Re: advice for heavy traffic capturing Guy Harris (Aug 08)
- Re: advice for heavy traffic capturing Darren Reed (Aug 08)
- Re: advice for heavy traffic capturing Guy Harris (Aug 08)
- Re: advice for heavy traffic capturing Fulvio Risso (Aug 09)
- Re: advice for heavy traffic capturing Darren Reed (Aug 09)
- Re: advice for heavy traffic capturing Fulvio Risso (Aug 09)
- Re: advice for heavy traffic capturing Darren Reed (Aug 09)
- Re: advice for heavy traffic capturing Fulvio Risso (Aug 09)
- Re: advice for heavy traffic capturing Loris Degioanni (Aug 09)
- Re: advice for heavy traffic capturing Darren Reed (Aug 10)
- Re: advice for heavy traffic capturing Loris Degioanni (Aug 10)
- Re: advice for heavy traffic capturing Motonori Shindo (Aug 12)
- Re: advice for heavy traffic capturing Darren Reed (Aug 14)
- Re: advice for heavy traffic capturing Fulvio Risso (Aug 15)
- Re: advice for heavy traffic capturing Darren Reed (Aug 16)
- Re: advice for heavy traffic capturing Fulvio Risso (Aug 16)
- Re: advice for heavy traffic capturing Guy Harris (Aug 08)