tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: significance of init_addrtoname()
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 16:39:48 -0800
On Sun, Nov 23, 2003 at 06:27:26PM -0600, alex medvedev wrote:
no, no problem is caused by calling init_addrtoname(). i am trying to change a tcpdump-like tool that uses proprietary format for dumping packets to a file to use libpcap.
If it's just dumping to a file, and printing any human-readable dissection of packets, you shouldn't need "init_addrtoname()"; the stuff it initializes is used for generating human-readable output. - This is the TCPDUMP workers list. It is archived at http://www.tcpdump.org/lists/workers/index.html To unsubscribe use mailto:tcpdump-workers-request () tcpdump org?body=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- significance of init_addrtoname() alex medvedev (Nov 23)
- Re: significance of init_addrtoname() Guy Harris (Nov 23)
- Re: significance of init_addrtoname() alex medvedev (Nov 23)
- Re: significance of init_addrtoname() Guy Harris (Nov 23)
- Re: significance of init_addrtoname() alex medvedev (Nov 23)
- Re: significance of init_addrtoname() Guy Harris (Nov 23)