Re: New Snort breaks pulled pork

["Joel Esler \(jesler\) via Snort-users" <snort-users () lists snort org>]

No one tested with the beta I guess?

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 12, 2017, at 11:25 PM, "wkitty42 () windstream net<mailto:wkitty42 () windstream net>" <wkitty42 () windstream 
net<mailto:wkitty42 () windstream net>> wrote:

On 10/12/2017 06:52 PM, Y M via Snort-users wrote:
James, if you explicitly set snort_version to 2.9.11.0 in the PulledPork conf


the real problem is that this is the first time there's been a sub-version number that has been larger than 9... 
there's a lot of code out there that broke on this 2.9.11 version of snort because in the past the version numbers have 
always been 0-9... there are numerous snort related projects climbing out of this hole now...


--
NOTE: No off-list assistance is given without prior approval.
      *Please keep mailing list traffic on the list unless*
      *a signed and pre-paid contract is in effect with us.*
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists snort org<mailto:Snort-users () lists snort org>
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.snort.org/mailman/listinfo/snort-users

Please visit http://blog.snort.org to stay current on all the latest Snort news!

_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists snort org
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.snort.org/mailman/listinfo/snort-users

Please visit http://blog.snort.org to stay current on all the latest Snort news!