Snort mailing list archives
Re: Barnyard not using gen-msg.map
From: Y M <snort () outlook com>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 18:46:09 +0000
In a nutshell, since ET rules do not contain policy metadata, the sid-msg.map does not get updated with the new signatures, hence, Barnyard2 is not able to get the signatures' messages. To elaborate more in a generic form, PulledPork uses the specified rules policy (using -I) to determine which rules to enable depending on the chosen policy, i.e.: security, balanced, connectivity. This is done through a signature's policy that is defined in the metadata keyword. This also allows PulledPork to parse the messages from the matching policy and update the sid-msg.map. When Barnyard2 reads the unidied2 output, it will get the signature message from the updated sid-msg.map. When it does not find the signature in question, it will replace it the message you have been seeing. One workaround on top of my head is to modify the singatures - using modifysid.conf - to include the policy/metadata needed. I want to say I have tried this at some point though I can't remember as you may get into a chicken-egg situation. Give PulledPork documentation a read and see the order in which the rules are processed. YM ________________________________________ From: Jon P <jon () streamlinedev net> Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2016 1:05 PM To: snort-users () lists sourceforge net Subject: [Snort-users] Barnyard not using gen-msg.map m using the ET Community rule set. Pulled pork updates this daily. That seems to be working fine. I did something that is causing my alerts to now be loaded as Snort Alert [1:2101411:12] in BASE. I *think* the issue is with the gen_file and sid_file; but my config looks ok. config classification_file: /etc/snort/classification.config config gen_file: /etc/snort/gen-msg.map config reference_file: /etc/snort/reference.config config sid_file: /etc/snort/sid-msg.map input unified2 output alert_fast: stdout output database: log, mysql, user=snort xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Both the *.map files look right and have the text for the alerts im seeing. Is it better practice to use the -S and -G options? Thanks! -jp ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial! https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=snort-users Please visit http://blog.snort.org to stay current on all the latest Snort news! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial! https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=snort-users Please visit http://blog.snort.org to stay current on all the latest Snort news!
Current thread:
- Barnyard not using gen-msg.map Jon P (May 04)
- Re: Barnyard not using gen-msg.map Y M (May 04)
- Re: Barnyard not using gen-msg.map Jon P (May 04)
- Re: Barnyard not using gen-msg.map Y M (May 04)