Snort mailing list archives
Re: Super Fast Snort Considerations
From: "Joel Esler (jesler)" <jesler () cisco com>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 14:42:09 +0000
It’s definitely possible. It’s just not easy to do. -- Joel Esler Manager, Threat Intelligence Team & Open Source Talos Group http://www.talosintel.com On Aug 31, 2015, at 10:32 AM, Davison, Charles Robert <cdaviso1 () vols utk edu<mailto:cdaviso1 () vols utk edu>> wrote: Good Morning, We wanted to deploy the snort installation along side our bro hardware configuration: https://commons.lbl.gov/display/cpp/100G+Intrusion+Detection 100G Intrusion Detection - Cyber Security Website Cyber Security Website After extensive evaluation, deployment and testing, the Berkeley Lab Cyber Security Team brought our 100G capable network monitoring system online in January 2015. We created the following technical document to help other security teams and interested in Read more...<https://commons.lbl.gov/display/cpp/100G+Intrusion+Detection> I was wondering if Packet Pig was still a viable source for processing Big Data. Our data centers could grow up to 400Gb/s and we wanted it to be virtualized. Joel, If this is not possible by open source means we will consider the FirePower appliances. CHARLES R. DAVISON (865)730-0078 cdaviso1 () vols utk edu<mailto:cdaviso1 () vols utk edu> ________________________________ From: Jaime Nebrera <jnebrera () redborder org<mailto:jnebrera () redborder org>> Sent: Monday, August 31, 2015 2:00 AM To: snort-users () lists sourceforge net<mailto:snort-users () lists sourceforge net> Subject: Re: [Snort-users] Super Fast Snort Considerations Hi Charles, it seems you are mixing a bit. To have a sensor capable of holding 100Gbps in Snort you need some serious stuff, sepcialized hardware, I guess hardware offloading, etc etc But you also name BY2. This is a different ball game. To be able to manage the events produced by such amount of traffic (in this case combining multiple probes) you will need also some serious beef, but the are alternatives there too, both based on SQL and Big Data El 30/08/15 a las 18:32, Joel Esler (jesler) escribió: To do 100 Gb/s, you'd need specialized hardware and flow-pinning to divide the traffic amongst several different copies of Snort. Our firePOWER devices achieve these speeds, but with a lot of specialized code. -- Joel Esler Manager, Threat Intelligence and Open Source Talos Group Sent from my iPhone On Aug 30, 2015, at 10:41 AM, Davison, Charles Robert <cdaviso1 () vols utk edu<mailto:cdaviso1 () vols utk edu>> wrote: Good Morning, I was wondering what everyone is using in production for processing snort data at high throughput. We will need to process up to 100Gb/s. I had considered using Packet Pig but don’t know if it’s still viable, the neat thing about it was that it leveraged Hadoop? We ran into performance issues with Snorby and I’m leaning towards just a basic snort install forwarding alerts to our syslog server to be processed by our SEIM tool… any suggestions? If we used By2 I’m not sure it could handle the data. Hardware/Architecture design specifications would be much appreciated. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net<mailto:Snort-users () lists sourceforge net> Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=snort-users Please visit http://blog.snort.org<http://blog.snort.org/> to stay current on all the latest Snort news! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net<mailto:Snort-users () lists sourceforge net> Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=snort-users Please visit http://blog.snort.org<http://blog.snort.org/> to stay current on all the latest Snort news! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net<mailto:Snort-users () lists sourceforge net> Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=snort-users Please visit http://blog.snort.org to stay current on all the latest Snort news!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=snort-users Please visit http://blog.snort.org to stay current on all the latest Snort news!
Current thread:
- Super Fast Snort Considerations Davison, Charles Robert (Aug 30)
- Re: Super Fast Snort Considerations Joel Esler (jesler) (Aug 30)
- Re: Super Fast Snort Considerations Jaime Nebrera (Aug 31)
- Re: Super Fast Snort Considerations Davison, Charles Robert (Aug 31)
- Re: Super Fast Snort Considerations Joel Esler (jesler) (Aug 31)
- Re: Super Fast Snort Considerations Jaime Nebrera (Aug 31)
- Re: Super Fast Snort Considerations Joel Esler (jesler) (Aug 30)