Snort mailing list archives
Re: Proposed change to sid:24348 - I don't think it encompasses all the allowed X-Forwarded-For rules
From: Scott Savarese <scott.savarese () vitals com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 15:27:59 -0500
On Jan 8, 2015, at 2:32 PM, waldo kitty <wkitty42 () windstream net> wrote: sounds like you have thousands of playas trying to cause problems with your system(s)...
I've looked at most of the IP addresses... They are valid IP addresses of our customers. Plus looking at the data within the packets themselves, the rule is tripping on valid data. Things like IPv6 addresses. Shouldn't the valid data be included in the PCRE regex? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net _______________________________________________ Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs () lists sourceforge net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs http://www.snort.org Please visit http://blog.snort.org for the latest news about Snort!
Current thread:
- Proposed change to sid:24348 - I don't think it encompasses all the allowed X-Forwarded-For rules Scott Savarese (Jan 08)
- Re: Proposed change to sid:24348 - I don't think it encompasses all the allowed X-Forwarded-For rules waldo kitty (Jan 08)
- Re: Proposed change to sid:24348 - I don't think it encompasses all the allowed X-Forwarded-For rules Scott Savarese (Jan 08)
- Re: Proposed change to sid:24348 - I don't think it encompasses all the allowed X-Forwarded-For rules waldo kitty (Jan 08)