Re: [Emerging-Sigs] Rule assist

[Will Metcalf <wmetcalf () emergingthreatspro com>]

Should work just fine. Usually when things should work but don't, I
automatically suspect incomplete/corrupted pcap. Trying running the pcap
again with "-k none" ?

Regards,

Will


On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:57 AM, James Lay <jlay () slave-tothe-box net>wrote:

> Hey all,
>
> So once in a while I see a compromised site that has something like the
> below after an initial redirect:
>
> GET /?1 HTTP/1.1
> <snip>
> Host: 93.171.172.179
>
> HTTP/1.1 302 Found
> <snip>
> LOCATION: http://93.171.172.179/?2
>
> I'm trying to determine what's the best method for catching this.  Here's
> what I think I understand:
>
> http_uri would match "?1", would http_raw_uri match "/?1" or even "/?1
> HTTP/1.1"?  I'd like to ideally match the entire "GET /?1 HTTP/1.1"..I've
> tried matching with http_header and http_raw_header, but I've not had any
> luck getting snort to fire on the pcap.  I've hexed the ? and ? as well.
>  Any assistance would help...thanks all!
>
> James
>
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Emerging-sigs mailing list
> Emerging-sigs@lists.**emergingthreats.net<Emerging-sigs () lists emergingthreats net>
> https://lists.emergingthreats.**net/mailman/listinfo/emerging-**sigs<https://lists.emergingthreats.net/mailman/listinfo/emerging-sigs>
>
> Support Emerging Threats! Subscribe to Emerging Threats Pro
> http://www.emergingthreats.net
> The ONLY place to get complete premium rulesets for all versions of
> Suricata and Snort 2.4.0 through Current!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev

_______________________________________________
Snort-sigs mailing list
Snort-sigs () lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs
http://www.snort.org


Please visit http://blog.snort.org for the latest news about Snort!