Snort mailing list archives
pcaps for triggering rules
From: Pratik Narang <pratik.cse.bits () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 11:56:58 +0530
Dear Snort users, A good deal of Snort rules do a 'content' check. Can I use some utility so that I may be able to craft or tamper packets just to suit them to trigger Snort rules of my choice? Essentially, I guess, I am asking if I can create sample pcaps or modify actual pcap captures which will trigger certain rules. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users Please visit http://blog.snort.org to stay current on all the latest Snort news!
Current thread:
- pcaps for triggering rules Pratik Narang (Aug 23)
- Re: pcaps for triggering rules waldo kitty (Aug 23)
- Re: pcaps for triggering rules Tony Robinson (Aug 23)
- Re: pcaps for triggering rules Sunny James Fugate (Aug 24)
- Re: pcaps for triggering rules Joel Esler (Aug 24)
- Re: pcaps for triggering rules Sunny James Fugate (Aug 24)
- Re: pcaps for triggering rules Gmail Personal (Aug 24)
- Re: pcaps for triggering rules Tony Robinson (Aug 24)
- Re: pcaps for triggering rules Pratik Narang (Aug 24)
- Re: pcaps for triggering rules Tony Robinson (Aug 24)
- Re: pcaps for triggering rules Peter Bates (Aug 24)
- Re: pcaps for triggering rules Heine Lysemose (Aug 24)
- Re: pcaps for triggering rules Gmail Personal (Aug 24)
- Re: pcaps for triggering rules Heine Lysemose (Aug 24)
(Thread continues...)