Re: [barnyard2-users] Re: Fwd: Missing packets with by2

[beenph <beenph () gmail com>]

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Jim Hranicky <jfh () ufl edu> wrote:
> On 07/24/2012 03:32 PM, beenph wrote:
>
> > Sorry for the confusion  1.10..2 kind of put me into an interrogaton mode.
> > Could you upgrade to latest 2-1.10
> > https://github.com/firnsy/barnyard2/tree/pre-stable Commit ID:
> > bdc39848ce.
>
>
> Ok, I'll try to get to that in the next day or so as I need to
> merge my patch into it.
>
>
> > A few lines of code have changed since then and i would like to see if
> > it fixes the issue.
>
>
> Does it just put the extra packets in the db with a new (sid, cid) ?

Well the other packet should have the same sid,gid the same sensor_id
and a different cid for sure since its a different
event.

> > Never the less, if you are in a position to anonymise your unified2
> > file i wouldn't mind also taking a look if it can help you.
>
>
> I'll send you the info offline.

Np.

-elz

> Jim

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users

Please visit http://blog.snort.org to stay current on all the latest Snort news!