Snort mailing list archives
Re: BASE sensor name
From: "Lay, James" <james.lay () wincofoods com>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 10:07:34 -0600
You should use db logging from BY2 James, since you can have logging from two output pluggins, it would be more efficient for the ole process to have both output pluggins configured there and i think
you
wouldn't have that problem with the sensor name.I agree. http://blog.snort.org/2011/06/snorts-output-methods.html Joel
Well I'll be....where did I get the impression that barnyard2 could only do one output? Weird...sure does though...and my interface name issue is fine now...reason #23443 to subscribe to this list ;) Thanks Gents :) James ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Got Input? Slashdot Needs You. Take our quick survey online. Come on, we don't ask for help often. Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek. http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users Please see http://www.snort.org/docs for documentation
Current thread:
- BASE sensor name Lay, James (Aug 01)
- Re: BASE sensor name Joel Esler (Aug 01)
- Re: BASE sensor name Lay, James (Aug 01)
- Message not available
- Re: BASE sensor name Lay, James (Aug 01)
- Re: BASE sensor name beenph (Aug 01)
- Re: BASE sensor name Joel Esler (Aug 01)
- Re: BASE sensor name Lay, James (Aug 01)
- Re: BASE sensor name Lay, James (Aug 01)
- Re: BASE sensor name Joel Esler (Aug 01)