Snort mailing list archives
switch port as network tap?
From: John Williams <john.b.williams () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:19:43 -0500
I need to get a SNORT system up and running quickly and have a couple questions: 1) Network taps seem very expensive. Possible stupid question: Is there a reason why one couldn't use a "sniffer" (i.e. read-only) port on a a Ethernet VLAN switch rather a Network Tap? Doesn't it do the same thing? 2) Is there an automated processes for updating the latest signatures? Thank you! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- switch port as network tap? John Williams (Feb 15)
- Re: switch port as network tap? Agus (Feb 15)
- Re: switch port as network tap? GravyFace (Feb 15)
- Re: switch port as network tap? John Williams (Feb 15)
- Re: switch port as network tap? Joel Esler (Feb 15)
- Re: switch port as network tap? John Williams (Feb 15)
- Re: switch port as network tap? Jason Brvenik (Feb 15)
- Re: switch port as network tap? GravyFace (Feb 15)
- Re: switch port as network tap? Agus (Feb 15)