Snort mailing list archives
Re: [Snort-users] EOL for Snort 2.8.5.3 and Snort 2.8.6.0 rules reminder
From: Nigel Houghton <nhoughton () sourcefire com>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 00:34:40 -0400
They are not our servers. Please direct your concerns to snort-site () snort org. We can forward your requests too. For the record, VRT has never run the infrastructure for snort.org. Just in case anyone wondered -- Nigel Houghton Head Mentalist SF VRT Department of Intelligence Excellence http://vrt-sourcefire.blogspot.com && http://labs.snort.org/ On Oct 4, 2010, at 10:03 PM, waldo kitty <wkitty42 () windstream net> wrote:
On 10/4/2010 20:58, Nigel Houghton wrote:On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 23:01:45 +0000, Michael Green wrote:So as a registered user I really only have 60 days, because I can't get a 2.9 rule set for another 30 days. Is that right?No. The rule packs will still roll over, you still have the 90 days.can you say if VRT has taken my suggestion(s) on redirecting "registered" users to the last "registered" user's rules snapshot file when they update their snort version on the bleeding edge? for example... when i get 2.9.0 compiled and working, my automated update routines will query snort for its version... they will see 2.9.0 and translate that to 2900 for the rules file pull... when the update script(s) contact the VRT update server with the OINKCODE and attempt to pull the 2900 rules sets archive, the VRT server will see that that OINKCODE is for a "registered" user... the last time i ran into this was when moving to 2.8.6.1 before there was a 2.8.6.1 archive for "registered" users... the update scripts got a "Forbidden" response from the VRT server instead of being redirected to the 2860 rules archive like they should be in a user/automation friendly environment... in this instance, i would expect that there would be a redirect to the 2861 rules archive for "registered" user OINKCODEs and that this would be in effect until there is a 2900 rules archive release in at least 30 days... does this make sense? i do hope it does this time... it didn't seem to last time :? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb _______________________________________________ Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs () lists sourceforge net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb _______________________________________________ Snort-sigs mailing list Snort-sigs () lists sourceforge net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-sigs
Current thread:
- EOL for Snort 2.8.5.3 and Snort 2.8.6.0 rules reminder Nigel Houghton (Oct 04)
- Re: EOL for Snort 2.8.5.3 and Snort 2.8.6.0 rules reminder Mike Lococo (Oct 04)
- Re: EOL for Snort 2.8.5.3 and Snort 2.8.6.0 rules reminder Nigel Houghton (Oct 04)
- Re: EOL for Snort 2.8.5.3 and Snort 2.8.6.0 rules reminder Randal T. Rioux (Oct 04)
- Re: EOL for Snort 2.8.5.3 and Snort 2.8.6.0 rules reminder waldo kitty (Oct 04)
- Re: EOL for Snort 2.8.5.3 and Snort 2.8.6.0 rules reminder Mike Lococo (Oct 05)
- Re: EOL for Snort 2.8.5.3 and Snort 2.8.6.0 rules reminder Nigel Houghton (Oct 04)
- Re: EOL for Snort 2.8.5.3 and Snort 2.8.6.0 rules reminder Michael Green (Oct 04)
- Re: EOL for Snort 2.8.5.3 and Snort 2.8.6.0 rules reminder Nigel Houghton (Oct 04)
- Re: [Snort-users] EOL for Snort 2.8.5.3 and Snort 2.8.6.0 rules reminder waldo kitty (Oct 04)
- Re: [Snort-users] EOL for Snort 2.8.5.3 and Snort 2.8.6.0 rules reminder Nigel Houghton (Oct 04)
- Re: [Snort-sigs] EOL for Snort 2.8.5.3 and Snort 2.8.6.0 rules reminder waldo kitty (Oct 04)
- snort website contact (was: Re: [Snort-sigs] EOL for Snort 2.8.5.3 and Snort 2.8.6.0 rules reminder) waldo kitty (Oct 05)
- Re: [Snort-sigs] snort website contact (was: Re: EOL for Snort 2.8.5.3 and Snort 2.8.6.0 rules reminder) Nigel Houghton (Oct 05)
- Re: snort website contact (was: Re: [Snort-sigs] EOL for Snort 2.8.5.3 and Snort 2.8.6.0 rules reminder) Joel Esler (Oct 05)
- Re: [Snort-sigs] snort website contact waldo kitty (Oct 05)
- Re: EOL for Snort 2.8.5.3 and Snort 2.8.6.0 rules reminder Nigel Houghton (Oct 04)
- Re: EOL for Snort 2.8.5.3 and Snort 2.8.6.0 rules reminder Mike Lococo (Oct 04)