Snort mailing list archives
afpacket vs. NFQ
From: Jason Wallace <jason.r.wallace () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 09:58:29 -0400
If snort using the afpacket DAQ can be deployed inline, why is there a NFQ DAQ? What does NFQ give you that afpacket does not? If you can run inline with out having to involve iptables wouldn't this make for a simpler deployment? thx, Wally ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- afpacket vs. NFQ Jason Wallace (Oct 12)
- Re: afpacket vs. NFQ Will Metcalf (Oct 12)