Snort mailing list archives
Re: Another early morning fatal warning
From: Richard Bejtlich <taosecurity () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 11:37:17 -0400
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Matt Olney <molney () sourcefire com> wrote:
Damn Mondays: "Yes, the published rules are >>NOW<< 2.8.4. specific." Matt
Is it just me, or should 2.8.4 have been 2.9 instead? Why does a sub-minor version (major.minor.sub-minor) contain so much new functionality (specifically thinking SMB here)? I know -- it's free; if you don't like it, tough, etc. :) Still, moving to 2.9 would have made it clearer to users and saved some support time, I think. Thank you, Richard ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Register Now & Save for Velocity, the Web Performance & Operations Conference from O'Reilly Media. Velocity features a full day of expert-led, hands-on workshops and two days of sessions from industry leaders in dedicated Performance & Operations tracks. Use code vel09scf and Save an extra 15% before 5/3. http://p.sf.net/sfu/velocityconf _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Another early morning fatal warning James Lay (May 04)
- Re: Another early morning fatal warning Matt Olney (May 04)
- Re: Another early morning fatal warning Matt Olney (May 04)
- Re: Another early morning fatal warning Richard Bejtlich (May 04)
- Re: Another early morning fatal warning Matt Olney (May 04)
- Re: Another early morning fatal warning Joel Esler (May 04)
- Re: Another early morning fatal warning Matt Olney (May 04)