Snort mailing list archives
Re: Poor performance using snort 2.8.x in inline mode
From: carlopmart <carlopmart () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:24:14 +0100
Edward Bjarte Fjellskål wrote:
carlopmart wrote:lspci -v 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX Host bridge (rev 01) Subsystem: VMware Inc Virtual Machine Chipset Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 000:13.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82545EM Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Copper) (rev 01) Subsystem: VMware Inc Abstract PRO/1000 MT Single Port Adapter Flags: bus master, 66MHz, medium devsel, latency 0, IRQ 193 Memory at f4880000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=128K] Memory at f4820000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=64K] I/O ports at 1480 [size=64] [virtual] Expansion ROM at 30020000 [disabled] [size=64K] Capabilities: [dc] Power Management version 2 Capabilities: [e4] PCI-X non-bridge deviceVMware... Other VMs running ? Total overview of the system resources usages ?
Correct, I am running this snort inline under vmware ESXi. ESXi staticis are: Memory Total: 5GB RAM Memory Used: 3.2 GB CPU usage: 240 MHz (Server it is Dual Core 2GHz) .. and I not using resource pools ...
E
-- CL Martinez carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Poor performance using snort 2.8.x in inline mode carlopmart (Jan 20)
- Re: Poor performance using snort 2.8.x in inline mode pieter claassen (Jan 20)
- Re: Poor performance using snort 2.8.x in inline mode carlopmart (Jan 21)
- Re: Poor performance using snort 2.8.x in inline mode Jim McCullough (Jan 21)
- Re: Poor performance using snort 2.8.x in inline mode carlopmart (Jan 21)
- Re: Poor performance using snort 2.8.x in inline mode Edward Bjarte Fjellskål (Jan 21)
- Re: Poor performance using snort 2.8.x in inline mode carlopmart (Jan 21)
- Re: Poor performance using snort 2.8.x in inline mode Leon Ward (Jan 21)
- Re: Poor performance using snort 2.8.x in inline mode carlopmart (Jan 21)
- Re: Poor performance using snort 2.8.x in inline mode Joel Esler (Jan 21)
- Re: Poor performance using snort 2.8.x in inline mode carlopmart (Jan 21)
- Re: Poor performance using snort 2.8.x in inline mode Matt Watchinski (Jan 21)
- Re: Poor performance using snort 2.8.x in inline mode carlopmart (Jan 21)
- Re: Poor performance using snort 2.8.x in inline mode Matt Watchinski (Jan 21)
- Re: Poor performance using snort 2.8.x in inline mode JJ Cummings (Jan 21)
- New Strata Guard - multi-gig and multi-segment snort engine on x86 Alan Shimel (Jan 21)
- Re: Poor performance using snort 2.8.x in inline mode (solved) carlopmart (Jan 23)
- Re: Poor performance using snort 2.8.x in inline mode carlopmart (Jan 21)
- Re: Poor performance using snort 2.8.x in inline mode pieter claassen (Jan 20)