Snort mailing list archives
Re: apparent discrepancies at http://www.snort.org/vrt/
From: Tim Maletic <tmaletic () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:40:28 -0500
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Nigel Houghton <nhoughton () sourcefire com> wrote:
Yes, we are aware of this issue. The shared object rules are not reflected in the changelog. All shared object rules are listed in the advisory for the rule release though as you found out.
I want to be able to go from VRT advisory -> GID|SID -> rulename, so that I can objdump rulename to convince myself that the VRT rules I've downloaded actually contain the update. -tm ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- apparent discrepancies at http://www.snort.org/vrt/ Tim Maletic (Feb 12)
- Re: apparent discrepancies at http://www.snort.org/vrt/ Nigel Houghton (Feb 12)
- Re: apparent discrepancies at http://www.snort.org/vrt/ Tim Maletic (Feb 12)
- Re: apparent discrepancies at http://www.snort.org/vrt/ Nigel Houghton (Feb 12)
- Re: apparent discrepancies at http://www.snort.org/vrt/ Tim Maletic (Feb 12)
- Re: apparent discrepancies at http://www.snort.org/vrt/ Nigel Houghton (Feb 12)