Snort mailing list archives
Re: Deployment Sizes? was: anyone trying kickfire to improve SQL performance?
From: "Stewart L" <stewartl42 () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 07:39:40 -0400
Well, I wasn't in charge of the deployment. I handed it off to one of the guys on my team to do the research and recommendations. Part of the problem is that there is no SOLID advice out there on how to set up and tweak a lot of this stuff. We have the oreilly books and have done some searches, but there is a lot of hand waving and not a lot of solid answers. So, you're saying that if I were to have another machine do the actual capture and a separate database machine, I'd be better off in the long haul? That should be pretty easy to set up. Stewart On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Jason Haar <Jason.Haar () trimble co nz> wrote:
Stewart L wrote:Define a large installation? That's something I've been wondering... We've set up a big central snort box on a 16 core machine with 16GB or RAM and 1.2TB of disk. We're currently running 6 instances of snort on this hardware and plan on having 12-16 instances when our rollout is complete. We'll likely also have a couple remote sensors feeding stuff into MySQL over the network...well that classifies you as "a large installation" in my eyes :-) BTW: are you saying you're running 6 instances of snort on the same box as your database? I thought that was a Bad Idea(tm)... However, I guess if your IDS only generate 1 event per minute, then there really isn't much competing occurring. Although when you actually use the SQL data (eg via BASE), then it could hurt your packet inspection...? -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C063 5EBB FE1D 66D1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users<https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-usersSnort-users>list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
-- Stewart The revolution will not be televised. The revolution will be no re-run brothers; The revolution will be live.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Re: Deployment Sizes? was: anyone trying kickfire to improve SQL performance? Jason Haar (May 02)
- Re: Deployment Sizes? was: anyone trying kickfire to improve SQL performance? Stewart L (May 03)
- Message not available
- Re: Deployment Sizes? was: anyone trying kickfire to improve SQL performance? Jason Haar (May 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Deployment Sizes? was: anyone trying kickfire to improve SQL performance? moses (May 05)