Snort mailing list archives
RE: Checkpoint Acquisition and the future of Open Source Snort
From: Theodore Stout <theodorestout () yahoo com>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 06:59:49 -0700 (PDT)
Let's just trust Marty on this one. He has been right up until now so why doubt him at this point? Even though I have had some serious doubts about this, all in all, Sourcefire and Checkpoint will become better because of this and somewhere, someplace, the Pig will be stronger. I suspose we all just have to get used to such a large company being involved with Sourcefire. It is for the best. Wayne, Tom, and Marty have made the right decision. I doubt that Checkpoint will negatively affect Snort development and yes Interspect could use a bit more intergration with Snort rules. Theo --- SN ORT <snort_on_acid () yahoo com> wrote:
Soo....Two opposing views, who will be right? Time will tell my friends! Cheese! Marc --- Paul Melson <pmelson () gmail com> wrote:-----Original Message----- Subject: Re: [Snort-users] Checkpoint Acquisition and the future of Open Source SnortOh pullleeeze! I predict that Snort will be gonevery soon. Let's seeeeee, a corporate"competitor" buys up an open-source and FREEcompetitor, and things will remain thesame? Everything will continue to be free andpeople will continue to develop for it?Uh-huh. You know, I actually wouldn't mind paying a bitfor Snort, but mostly because it is/wasa "grassroots program". We support theopen-sourced communities. I mean, open-source isall about alternatives, ingenuity and a sort of'family'. Well folks, that is nowhistory. I believe Snort has now been 'soldout'.The smartest thing for us to do is start lookingfor an alternative.And open-source developers need to startbuildinga newer and better system, if you'rea developer and want some fame and recognition,talk to me! I am no developer, but Iknow enough about just about everything IT, andeven some programming skills, and wouldbe glad to help. Now is the time to start!You say the sky is falling on Snort, but I doubtitfor a number of reasons. 1. The GPL will minimally allow the ongoing useanddevelopment of Snort 2.4.x regardless of what Check Point wants to do.2. Snort is a well-known brand in the IDS market - that's value Check Point would be foolish to throw away or relinquishcontrolof by dismantling its open source engine. 3. Check Point has not shown itself to be acompanythat buys up competition in order to kill it (with one notable exception -Istill maintain that they bought Zone to keep Cisco from buying them andusingIntegrity to compete with SecureClient, but that's another story.) 4. Sourcefire is more than just Snort. NIDS is an established market, and though Snort is a standard player, it would make more sense to me that Check Point might be pursuing some of the more leading edge stuff Sourcefire offers, such as RNA and Defense Center. (And between you and me, Check Point would do well to sell the Sourcefire appliances instead of their own starting immediately - InterSpect is a lousyengine,and most people know it.) Just my $0.02, but this is much ado about very little. PaulM__________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page! http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Checkpoint Acquisition and the future of Open Source Snort Sam Evans (Oct 07)
- Re: Checkpoint Acquisition and the future of Open Source Snort Jennifer Steffens (Oct 07)
- Re: Checkpoint Acquisition and the future of Open Source Snort Jennifer Steffens (Oct 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Checkpoint Acquisition and the future of Open Source Snort Wally Bedford (Oct 07)
- Re: Checkpoint Acquisition and the future of Open Source Snort Jennifer Steffens (Oct 07)
- Re: Checkpoint Acquisition and the future of Open Source Snort SN ORT (Oct 10)
- Re: Checkpoint Acquisition and the future of Open Source Snort Dirk Geschke (Oct 10)
- Re: Checkpoint Acquisition and the future of Open Source Snort Bob Walder (Oct 10)
- RE: Checkpoint Acquisition and the future of Open Source Snort Paul Melson (Oct 10)
- RE: Checkpoint Acquisition and the future of Open Source Snort SN ORT (Oct 10)
- RE: Checkpoint Acquisition and the future of Open Source Snort Theodore Stout (Oct 11)
- RE: Checkpoint Acquisition and the future of Open Source Snort Matt Jonkman (Oct 17)
- Re: Checkpoint Acquisition and the future of Open Source Snort Jennifer Steffens (Oct 07)