Snort mailing list archives
bpf filter versus "config ignore_ports"
From: Martin Olsson <elof () sentor se>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 11:30:18 +0100 (CET)
Which is better for performance, filter out unwanted traffic using a bpf filter or using the configuration statement "ignore_ports"? I'm guessing that bpf is better. So when should one use "ignore_ports"? /Elof ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- bpf filter versus "config ignore_ports" Martin Olsson (Dec 06)
- Re: bpf filter versus "config ignore_ports" Dirk Geschke (Dec 06)