RE: Second Snort instance killing performance

["Paul Melson" <pmelson () gmail com>]

I was thinking that, or something like it, could be the case.  Originally
both sensors were configured to log to MySQL, and I thought that it might be
that they were fighting to lock a table to insert alerts.  So I switched
both to unified logging (separate log files), but the performance problems
persist.    

PaulM

-----Original Message-----
Subject: Re: [Snort-users] Second Snort instance killing performance

If you are using same logs maybe performance suffers becouse those two
processes are fighting for access to the same logs?




-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users