Snort mailing list archives
Re: Snort with SingleStream device?
From: Michael Stone <mstone+snort () mathom us>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 11:13:12 -0500
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 09:07:41AM -0600, Eric Hines wrote:
The Port Aggregators allow you to no longer have to do port bonding in Linux on a Snort sensor, eliminating having to waste a second NIC. The Port Aggs bond the A and B ports together in to a single monitoring port on the Tap.
Of course, if you actually use a full duplex 100M link you're going to run into trouble unless the port aggregator magically fits 200M of traffic down a 100M pipe... Mike Stone ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Snort with SingleStream device? JP Garcia (Feb 01)
- RE: Snort with SingleStream device? Eric Hines (Feb 01)
- Re: Snort with SingleStream device? Michael Stone (Feb 01)
- RE: Snort with SingleStream device? Eric Hines (Feb 01)