Snort mailing list archives
Re: Problem with the -o option
From: Matt Kettler <mkettler () evi-inc com>
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2004 15:32:53 -0500
At 10:50 AM 11/5/2004, Kaplan, Andrew H. wrote:
1. When listing the -o option, do I need to include the full path thepolicy-based.rules file similarly to how it is done for the -c snort.conf file?
erm, -o does not take any filenames as a parameter. It's just a flag that changes the rule processing. It's just -o not "-o file" or "-o /path/file".
add policy-based-rules to your snort.conf as an include. Don't pass it on the command-line.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Problem with the -o option Kaplan, Andrew H. (Nov 05)
- Message not available
- Re: Problem with the -o option Matt Kettler (Nov 05)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Problem with the -o option Matt Kettler (Nov 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Problem with the -o option Kaplan, Andrew H. (Nov 05)