Snort mailing list archives
Re: Pat-Mached counter in perfmonitor preprocessor
From: Jeremy Hewlett <jh () sourcefire com>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 16:36:32 -0400
On Tue, Oct 19, sekure wrote:
Can you explain why certain traffic wouldn't be pattern matched?
We don't have a rule or we're ignoring traffic (ie: flow_depth in http_inspect where we ignore some server-side traffic).
I am seeing < 70% pattern matched on some sensors. Is this "bad"?
This is normal. When tuning for performance, the lower this number, the better. On an average network, this percentage is anywhere between 15%-40% pattern match. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Pat-Mached counter in perfmonitor preprocessor sekure (Oct 19)
- Re: Pat-Mached counter in perfmonitor preprocessor Jeremy Hewlett (Oct 19)
- Re: Pat-Mached counter in perfmonitor preprocessor sekure (Oct 19)
- Re: Pat-Mached counter in perfmonitor preprocessor Jeremy Hewlett (Oct 19)
- Re: Pat-Mached counter in perfmonitor preprocessor sekure (Oct 19)
- Re: Pat-Mached counter in perfmonitor preprocessor Jeremy Hewlett (Oct 19)