Snort mailing list archives
Re: Spool Processors
From: Dirk Geschke <Dirk_Geschke () genua de>
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 18:43:05 +0200
Hi Gary,
I am considering using the unified logging output plugin for snort with a spool processor to dump the alerts/logs to MySQL. As I see it I have 3 options: Barnyard, Mudpit and Flop. Flop is out since I don't believe it actually reads unified logs, but more importantly it can't support more than one snort instance per machine, according to the documentation.
yes FLoP only allows one snort process for a remote sensor. But why do you want to run more instances? In my eyes it does not make any sense at all. If the traffic is to high for one snort process then you should think about a second machine. The overhead of running two instances of snort on one machine is much too high. If you have several network cards in several networks then you should really think of installing several boxes each running one snort process. One advantage of FLoP is that you don't need to worry about disk space on the sensor running snort... Best regards Dirk ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Spool Processors Gary_Portnoy (Apr 01)
- Re: Spool Processors Dirk Geschke (Apr 01)
- Re: Spool Processors Josh Berry (Apr 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Spool Processors Gary_Portnoy (Apr 01)
- Re: Spool Processors Dirk Geschke (Apr 01)
- Re: Spool Processors Dirk Geschke (Apr 01)