Snort mailing list archives

Re: Snort 1.8.7 does not log anything (OS: SuSE 8.1)


From: JP Vossen <vossenjp () netaxs com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:18:03 -0500 (EST)

Michael Steele wrote:

Is there a specific reason why your using such an outdated Snort?

No. I'm a beginner with snort and I want to become somewhat familiar
with snort before trying to compile and install it by my self. The
version I use is the one coming with the OS as rpm package. In addition,
this is my first root server and before upgrading an OS on a server, to
which I have no physical access...I will wait some time ;-).

How about getting the latest snort.org RPMs?  I forget wahat version of RPM
SuSE 8.1 uses, but I think it's pretty current.

So you should be able to do (assuming you have wget):

wget http://www.snort.org/dl/binaries/linux/snort-2.0.4-1.i386.rpm
        and optionally
wget http://www.snort.org/dl/binaries/linux/snort-mysql-2.0.4-1.i386.rpm
        and/or
wget http://www.snort.org/dl/binaries/linux/snort-postgresql-2.0.4-1.i386.rpm

        then
rpm -Uvh snort*.rpm


--OR--


rpm -Uvh http://www.snort.org/dl/binaries/linux/snort-2.0.4-1.i386.rpm
        etc., etc.


I know we are 1 version behind (Snort source is 2.0.5, the RPMs are 2.0.4).
We chose not to build 2.0.5 RPMs because 2.1.0 is coming Real Soon Now...
Let me know if that's a real problem for anyone. But if you really want 2.0.5
RPMs:
wget http://www.snort.org/dl/snort-2.0.5.tar.gz
rpmbuild -ta snort-2.0.5.tar.gz

Read these for more details:
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/snort/snort/contrib/rpm/README.build_rpms
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/snort/snort/contrib/rpm/README.rpms

Later,
JP
------------------------------|:::======|--------------------------------
JP Vossen, CISSP              |:::======|         jp{at}jpsdomain{dot}org
My Account, My Opinions       |=========|       http://www.jpsdomain.org/
------------------------------|=========|--------------------------------
You used to have to reboot the Windows 9.x series every couple of days
because it would crash.  Now you have to reboot Windows 200x or XP every
couple of days because of a patch.  How is that better or more stable?



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users


Current thread: