Snort mailing list archives
Re: BPF Alternative for PPPOE?
From: Chris Green <cmg () sourcefire com>
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 09:04:50 -0400
"Richard A. Burman III" <Richard.Burman () cinagen com> writes:
Sorry to ramble, but I wanted to be as specific as possible and hope that someone might have a suggestion as to what I can do. I tried just for grins to see if snort treated the bpf any different than tcpdump did, but did not seem to have any success (with PPPOE). In the meantime, I will read-up a little more on excluding hosts in the snort.conf file and welcome any suggestions.
Does PPPoE create any other devices that can be used for sniffing rather than the raw etherent device? -- Chris Green <cmg () sourcefire com> You now have 14 minutes to reach minimum safe distance. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01 _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- BPF Alternative for PPPOE? Richard A. Burman III (Jun 30)
- Re: BPF Alternative for PPPOE? Chris Green (Jul 01)
- RE: BPF Alternative for PPPOE? Richard A. Burman III (Jul 01)
- Re: BPF Alternative for PPPOE? Chris Green (Jul 01)