RE: Snort as Gigabit Sensor

["Kreimendahl, Chad J" <Chad.Kreimendahl () umb com>]

Very good reason.

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Green [mailto:cmg () sourcefire com] 
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 10:11 AM
To: Kreimendahl, Chad J
Cc: Bennett Todd; Banniza Robert; snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Subject: Re: [Snort-users] Snort as Gigabit Sensor


"Kreimendahl, Chad J" <Chad.Kreimendahl () umb com> writes:

> ... This leads me to... What about a threading snort.  I know this was
> going on a while back but taken out... Why?

Didn't work, unmaintained, highly increased portability barrier, code
complexity.
-- 
Chris Green <cmg () sourcefire com>
Laugh and the world laughs with you, snore and you sleep alone.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users