Re: Do 1.9 rules work with 2.0?

["Kenneth G. Arnold" <bkarnold () cbu edu>]

There is a new set of rules delivered with 2.0 which should be used.  They
follow the snortrules-current branch of the rules rather than the
snortrules-stable branch.  Some of the rules have been rewritten and use
new keywords.  Some of the the 1.9.x rules don't work with the 2.0
version.

Ken

On Sun, 6 Apr 2003, Jesse W. Asher wrote:

> Apologies if this has been asked and answered already.  Do rules for
> snort 1.9 work with 2.0?  Are there any downsides to running 2.0 vs.
> 1.9?  Thanks!!
>
> --
> Jesse W. Asher
>
> "They that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary
> safety, deserve neither liberty or safety."  - Benjamin Franklin
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
> Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
> No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
> http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Snort-users mailing list
> Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
> Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
> Snort-users list archive:
> http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: 
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! 
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users