Snort mailing list archives
Re: DOS in Snort?
From: Erick Mechler <emechler () techometer net>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 14:35:55 -0800
:: Overall it took about 30 minuets to clear up everything. This is an OS issue and :: not a snort issue right? Is there a way to limit the number of alerts? Couldn't :: any snort box not logging to a database be susceptible to a DOS in this manner? The only way this could be used in a DoS against a snort sensor is if you have neglected to properly partition your disks, and you manage to fill up an important filesystem on your sensor. For instance, if you fill up /, some OS's might have a problem with that. Additionally, you can bring a Solaris system to its knees if you fill up /tmp. Cheers - Erick ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge. The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use. Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial. www.slickedit.com/sourceforge _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- DOS in Snort? Counselman, Chris Contractor/Sverdrup (Feb 21)
- Re: DOS in Snort? Erick Mechler (Feb 21)
- Re: DOS in Snort? Shane Williams (Feb 21)
- Re: DOS in Snort? Brian (Feb 21)
- Re: DOS in Snort? Erick Mechler (Feb 21)