Snort mailing list archives
Re: static compilation
From: Andreas Krennmair <ak () tcp-ip at>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 10:02:25 +0200
funky wrote:
I already tried that but nothing has changed. I've made the CFLAGS "-static" in "Makefile" but the size of the file is still 1053882 bytes . When i control with "file snort" , it still says "dynamically compiled" :(((( Where can be the mistake!??!?!
You cannot "statically compile" a program, you compile it and then statically _link_ it. So, first you have to use LDFLAGS instead of CFLAGS, and another good trick with autoconf based source trees is setting this already during the configure process, e.g.:
LDFLAGS="-static" ./configureand then go on just as before, i.e. make && make install. Before make install, you can check the binary with ldd and file whether it is really statically linked, but it should be anyway (I tried it out right now).
HTH, Andreas Krennmair ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- static compilation funky (Jul 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- static compilation funky (Jul 23)
- Re: static compilation Michael Boman (Jul 23)
- Re: static compilation funky (Jul 23)
- Re: static compilation Andreas Krennmair (Jul 24)
- Re: static compilation funky (Jul 24)
- Re: static compilation Chris Green (Jul 24)
- Re: static compilation funky (Jul 24)
- Re: static compilation Michael Boman (Jul 23)