Snort mailing list archives
American laws on compromised server legal responsibilities
From: Ian Masters <ian () pineapple co jp>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 12:03:32 +0900
This may be a little off topic, but I think it might apply to many users of this list.
Do any of our USA list members know if there are any American laws directly pertinent to the legal responsibilities of the owner of a server that has been compromised and used to attack a third party.
It looks to me as though even under Tort law it would be difficult to bring a case, where there is no contract between the the owner of the damaged server and the owner of the compromised server.
If anyone has any information to the contrary, I'd be very grateful to hear about it. If you're able to point me in the direction of any resources I'd also be very grateful. The only documents of any use I've been able to find is at
http://rr.sans.org/legal/liability.php http://rr.sans.org/legal/law.php and the legal section generally: http://rr.sans.org/legal/ Ian MastersPineapple Company
_______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- American laws on compromised server legal responsibilities Ian Masters (Jan 27)