Snort mailing list archives
Re: Cheaper Snort!
From: Ryan Russell <ryan () securityfocus com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 11:44:34 -0700 (MST)
On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, spyguy703 wrote:
Here is a silly question: Why do some users of snort choose to run snort on win32 platforms? Does that not defeat ONE of the benefits of using snort? That benefit being free?
Short story, the hardware costs money, so that's not free. The Windows license may already be owned (sunk money.) But really, the major factor will probably be OS expertise of the administrator. The cost of hiring, and perhaps training, a systems administrator totally dwarfs the cost of a Windows license. If the SA has never installed unix before, then having Snort on Win32 probably means that they now have an opportunity to run Snort, when they probably would have had to skip it otherwise. In many places, if it's a Windows shop, even if that particular SA can at least install Linux, the boss may not allow it. I've seen many managers who had the attitude that they don't want that weird box in the corner that only one guy can run, because what happens when he leaves? I'm not saying that it's a good idea, or that there isn't some benefit to having it on unix, but that's how it works. Ryan _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Cheaper Snort! spyguy703 (Mar 14)
- Re: Cheaper Snort! Leigh David Heyman (Mar 14)
- Re: Cheaper Snort! Ryan Russell (Mar 14)
- Re: Cheaper Snort! Martin Roesch (Mar 14)
- Re: Cheaper Snort! dr . kaos (Mar 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Cheaper Snort! McCammon, Keith (Mar 14)
- RE: Cheaper Snort! Wirth, Jeff (Mar 14)
- Re: Cheaper Snort! Davis Ray Sickmon, Jr (Mar 14)
- Re: Cheaper Snort! spyguy703 (Mar 14)