Snort mailing list archives
Re: portscan
From: Rich Adamson <radamson () routers com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 10:01:21 -0600
The portscan pattern that you're seeing is likely coming from an internal Windows box (netbeui noise) and/or DNS.
alexus wrote:my snort detects way too much of so called "portscan" even from my very own ip Oct 10 00:51:07 box snort[605]: spp_portscan: portscan status from 66.92.98.145: 6 connections across 6 hosts: TCP(0), UDP(6) Oct 10 00:51:07 box /kernel: Oct 10 00:51:07 box snort[605]: spp_portscan: portscan status from 66.92.98.145: 6 connections across 6 hosts: TCP(0), UDP(6) Oct 10 00:52:01 box snort[605]: spp_portscan: portscan status from 66.92.98.145: 2 connections across 2 hosts: TCP(0), UDP(2) i assume that this is missconfiguration of some kind.. i do not portscan myself.. any ideas? thank you in advance
_______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- portscan alexus (Oct 09)
- Re: portscan Byron York (Oct 10)
- Re: portscan Rich Adamson (Oct 10)
- Re: portscan Byron York (Oct 10)