Snort mailing list archives
RE: half the net for multiple snort processes
From: "Abe L. Getchell" <abegetchell () home com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 21:46:49 -0500
Hi Erek,
If it's Linux.... IIRC, many moons ago it's SMP ability sucked rocks. That may have changed, but I don't know. [Any Linux geeks out there, please speak up on this!]
SMP has improved greatly in Linux since 'many moons ago'. Got a quad proc PIII Xeon box that smokes through analyzing _large_ log files like you wouldn't believe. Anywho... There is, however, still no way in the 2.4 kernel to bind a process to a specific processor that _I_ know of; if I'm wrong, please correct me and point me to the kernel patch! I'd love to have that functionality as well. I've heard it may be included in 2.5. Windows 2000 Advanced Server, however, does have the ability to bind processes to specific processors. You can accomplish this task in 'Task Manager'. Works quite well actually. I used this functionality to squeeze the last little bit of performance out of a couple of Win2k servers before they got Service Pack 'L'. WARNING!!! The statement above is to be used for informational purposes only. I could not, due to recently uncovered security vulnerabilities and the company's stand on disclosure issues, recommend that _any_ Microsoft products be used in your security infrastructure in _any way_. WARNING!!! Thanks, Abe -- Abe L. Getchell Security Engineer abegetchell () home com _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- half the net for multiple snort processes Jamil Farshchi (Nov 14)
- Re: half the net for multiple snort processes Fyodor (Nov 14)
- Re: half the net for multiple snort processes Erek Adams (Nov 14)
- RE: half the net for multiple snort processes Abe L. Getchell (Nov 14)