Snort mailing list archives
Re: Professionalism
From: Ralf Hildebrandt <Ralf.Hildebrandt () charite de>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 07:58:10 +0100
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 02:39:00PM -0800, Joe Smith wrote:
monarch, Mr. Bill Gates. Many in the corporate world have a very negative opinion of open source precisely because of what I stated earlier regarding the unprofessional nature of open source.
Astoundingly, most unprofessional code performs better than so called professional code.
They will claim that the code is "untrustworthy". This doesn't mean it doesn't work (or can be configured to work). It doesn't mean that the programmers are untrustworthy.
What does it mean then? That the corporate world is made up of brand-trusting idiots?
to disqualify a product only because of lubrication references, but it does happen and it makes my job (ya know, intrusion detection and all that fun stuff) that much more difficult.
This is absurd. With open source he CAN look into it and say he doesn't like the "lubrication reference", but with closed source, he can't -- does that mean the "lubrication reference" isn't there? No.
Yes, its free. Yes, the classification.config file can be sed/grepped to do exactly what you want. And yes, its the best thing out there (its superior to every IDS I've tested, commercial or non). All I'm asking is for snort to make an effort to present a more professional appearance so that corporate acceptance is the default, not the exception.
OTOH a simple: "this might be porn" or "pr0n" would suffice... -- Ralf Hildebrandt Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155 Fax. +49 (0)30-450 570-916 ThisemailhasbeenbroughttoyoubyJOLTCola,favoredbyssysadmins,netadminsand programmerseverywhere. JOLTCola--forallthesugarandtwicethecaffine(R). _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Re: Professionalism, (continued)
- Re: Professionalism Guillaume (Nov 14)
- Re: Professionalism Brian (Nov 13)
- Re: Professionalism Erek Adams (Nov 13)
- Re: Professionalism Phil Wood (Nov 13)
- Re: Professionalism Gordon Ewasiuk (Nov 13)
- Re: Professionalism Joe Smith (Nov 13)
- Re: Professionalism Jon Bentley (Nov 13)
- Re: Professionalism George D. Nincehelser (Nov 13)
- Re: Professionalism olliecat (Nov 13)
- Re: Professionalism Ralf Hildebrandt (Nov 13)
- Re: Professionalism Gordon Ewasiuk (Nov 13)
- Re: Professionalism Ralf Hildebrandt (Nov 13)
- Re: Professionalism Joe Smith (Nov 14)
- Re: RE: Professionalism Mark Price (Nov 13)
- Re: RE: Professionalism Martin Forest (Nov 13)
- Re: RE: Professionalism Mike Poor (Nov 14)