Snort mailing list archives
Re: Linux and packet loss
From: "Matthew Collins" <Matthew.Collins () northernregistrars co uk>
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2001 10:27:42 +0100
I've found out what was going on here. All our inbound traffic comes through a reverse proxy server. The IDS only logs the Internet to Firewall traffic, and the reverse proxy is behind the firewall. The proxy server appears to be making multiple requests, to attempt to keep it's cache up to date. So a code red infected machine will do the default.ida?NNN trick (which snort will log). The proxy server will notice the reply from the web server, and then once every two minutes, will attempt the same request itself. Snort will not log this, because the proxy server is behind the firewall. I got logging switched on, on the reverse proxy, and these logs match up to the snort logs. Confused the hell out of me, but at least I know snort is logging everything.
Chris Green <cmg () uab edu> 01/08/01 18:05:20 >>>
"Matthew Collins" <Matthew.Collins () northernregistrars co uk> writes:
I've got snort 1.7 running on a Linux 2.2.19 (Debian) system. The code red worm is starting to get going now, and I've noticed an oddity. I've got one alert for .ida attempt in my snort log
What logging method are you using and how close together were the attacks? Was snort running at the time? What is your IDA rule? I've swear I've seen the packets get fragmented right at the default.ida break and one rule checking for 'ida?' wouldn't work unless you were using a stream reassembly. Lots of possibilities here. You might be running into old bugs in 1.7 but I don't know. -- Chris Green <cmg () uab edu> Laugh and the world laughs with you, snore and you sleep alone. **************************************************************************************** This message and any attachments are confidential to the ordinary user of the e-mail address to which it was addressed and may also be privileged. If you are not the addressee you may not copy, forward, disclose or use any part of the message or its attachments and if you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete it from your system. Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, arrive late or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the context of this message which arise as a result of Internet transmission. Northern Registrars Limited, Northern House, Woodsome Park, Fenay Bridge, Huddersfield. HD8 0LA. Tel: +44 (0) 1484 600900 Fax: +44 (0) 1484 600911 For more information visit our web site: http://www.northernregistrars.co.uk **************************************************************************************** _______________________________________________ Snort-users mailing list Snort-users () lists sourceforge net Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users Snort-users list archive: http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=snort-users
Current thread:
- Re: Loosing alerts with 1.8.1-beta5 (was: Linux and packet loss), (continued)
- Re: Loosing alerts with 1.8.1-beta5 (was: Linux and packet loss) Dragos Ruiu (Aug 01)
- Re: Loosing alerts with 1.8.1-beta5 (was: Linux and packet loss) Jason Haar (Aug 01)
- Re: Loosing alerts with 1.8.1-beta5 (was: Linux and packet loss) Steve Williams (Aug 01)
- Re: Loosing alerts with 1.8.1-beta5 (was: Linux and packet loss Jason Haar (Aug 02)
- Re: Loosing alerts with 1.8.1-beta5 (was: Linux and packet loss Andreas Östling (Aug 02)
- Re: Loosing alerts with 1.8.1-beta5 (was: Linux and packet loss) Daniel Harrison (Aug 02)
- Re: Loosing alerts with 1.8.1-beta5 (was: Linux and packet loss) Martin Roesch (Aug 09)
- Re: Loosing alerts with 1.8.1-beta5 (was: Linux and packet loss) Jason Haar (Aug 09)
- Re: Loosing alerts with 1.8.1-beta5 (was: Linux and packet loss) Martin Roesch (Aug 09)
- Re: Loosing alerts with 1.8.1-beta5 (was: Linux and packet loss) Martin Roesch (Aug 09)
- Re: Linux and packet loss Jason Haar (Aug 02)
- Re: Linux and packet loss Martin Roesch (Aug 02)
- Re: Linux and packet loss Jason Haar (Aug 02)
- Re: Linux and packet loss Phil Wood (Aug 02)
- ACID and MySQL questions Jason Lewis (Aug 02)
- Re: ACID and MySQL questions meling (Aug 03)