Secure Coding mailing list archives
Provably correct microkernel (seL4)
From: ljknews at mac.com (ljknews)
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 09:46:09 -0400
At 4:33 PM -0500 10/1/09, Wall, Kevin wrote:
"Professor Gernot Heiser, the John Lions Chair in Computer Science in the School of Computer Science and Engineering and a senior principal researcher with NICTA, said for the first time a team had been able to prove with mathematical rigour that an operating-system kernel -- the code at the heart of any computer or microprocessor -- was 100 per cent bug-free and therefore immune to crashes and failures."
Reading nothing beyond what was posted, the problem I see is to provide a complete specification against which to prove correctness. -- Larry Kilgallen
Current thread:
- Provably correct microkernel (seL4) Wall, Kevin (Oct 01)
- Provably correct microkernel (seL4) Jeremy Epstein (Oct 02)
- Provably correct microkernel (seL4) Dimitri DeFigueiredo (Oct 02)
- Provably correct microkernel (seL4) Jeremy Epstein (Oct 02)
- Provably correct microkernel (seL4) Dimitri DeFigueiredo (Oct 02)
- Provably correct microkernel (seL4) ljknews (Oct 02)
- Provably correct microkernel (seL4) Cassidy, Colin (GE Infra, Energy) (Oct 02)
- Provably correct microkernel (seL4) Gunnar Peterson (Oct 02)
- Provably correct microkernel (seL4) Chris Wysopal (Oct 02)
- Provably correct microkernel (seL4) Gunnar Peterson (Oct 02)
- Provably correct microkernel (seL4) Johan Peeters (Oct 02)
- Provably correct microkernel (seL4) Steven M. Christey (Oct 02)
- Provably correct microkernel (seL4) Wall, Kevin (Oct 02)
- Provably correct microkernel (seL4) Johan Peeters (Oct 03)
- Provably correct microkernel (seL4) Wall, Kevin (Oct 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Provably correct microkernel (seL4) Bobby Miller (Oct 02)
- Provably correct microkernel (seL4) Jeremy Epstein (Oct 02)