Secure Coding mailing list archives

What defines an InfoSec Professional?


From: michaelslists at gmail.com (Michael Silk)
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 08:59:11 +1100

On 3/9/07, McGovern, James F (HTSC, IT) <James.McGovern at thehartford.com>
wrote:

Traditionally InfoSec folks defined themselves as being knowledgable in
firewalls, policies, etc. Lately, many enterprises are starting to recognize
the importance of security within the software development lifecycle where
even some have acknowledged that software is a common problem space for
those things traditionally thought of as infrastructure.

The harder part is not in terms of recognizing the trend but in terms of
folks from the old world acknowledging folks from the new world (software
development) also as security professionals. I haven't seen many folks make
this transition. I do suspect that some of it is tied to the romance of
certifications such as CISSP whereby the exams that prove you are a security
professional talk all about physical security and network security but
really don't address software development in any meaningful way.

Would be intriguing for folks here that blog to discuss ways for folks to
transition / acknowledge respect not as just software developers with a
specialization in security but in being true security professionals and
treat them like peers all working on one common goal.



i hear you on this one.

australia, at least melbourne, still doesn't seem to have any idea of
software/application security professionals. almost all jobs that have
'security' in them, then go on to talk about all the firewalls you must know
how to configure. *sigh*. then there is the pen-testing side. there's should
be a new field, "security design" that accompanies application architect,
etc. then you have professional guidance of the security issues when
building for app.



-----Original Message-----
From: Shea, Brian A [mailto:Brian.A.Shea at bankofamerica.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 2:07 PM
To: Gunnar Peterson; McGovern, James F (HTSC, IT)
Cc: SC-L at securecoding.org
Subject: RE: [SC-L] What defines an InfoSec Professional?


The right answer is both IMO.  You need the thinkers, integrators, and
operators to do it right.  The term Security Professional at its basic
level simply denotes someone who works to make things secure.

You can't be secure with only application security any more than you can
be secure with only firewalls or NIDs.  The entire ecosystem and
lifecycle must be risk managed and that is accomplished by security
professionals.  Each professional may have a specialty due to the
breadth of topics covered by Security (let's not forget our Physical
Security either), but all would be expected to act as professionals.
Professionals in this definition being people who are certified and
expected to operate within specified standards of quality and behavior
much like CISSP, CPA, MD, etc.


*************************************************************************
This communication, including attachments, is
for the exclusive use of addressee and may contain proprietary,
confidential and/or privileged information.  If you are not the intended
recipient, any use, copying, disclosure, dissemination or distribution is
strictly prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this communication and
destroy all copies.
*************************************************************************


_______________________________________________
Secure Coding mailing list (SC-L) SC-L at securecoding.org
List information, subscriptions, etc -
http://krvw.com/mailman/listinfo/sc-l
List charter available at - http://www.securecoding.org/list/charter.php
SC-L is hosted and moderated by KRvW Associates, LLC (http://www.KRvW.com)
as a free, non-commercial service to the software security community.
_______________________________________________




-- 
mike
00110001 <3 00110111
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://krvw.com/pipermail/sc-l/attachments/20070309/cb7dacb4/attachment-0001.html 


Current thread: