Secure Coding mailing list archives

RE: Re: Application Insecurity --- Who is at Fault?

From: ljknews <ljknews () mac com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 04:11:38 +0100

At 10:45 AM -0400 4/11/05, Joel Kamentz wrote:

I don't have experience with the formal methods, but I can see that, supposing this were NASA,
etc., formal approaches
might lead to perfect protection.


Not perfect, but better than average:

http://www.fastcompany.com/online/06/writestuff.html
-- 
Larry Kilgallen

Current thread:

Re: Application Insecurity --- Who is at Fault?, (continued)
- - Re: Application Insecurity --- Who is at Fault? Jeff Williams (Apr 06)
    - Re: Application Insecurity --- Who is at Fault? Michael Silk (Apr 06)
    - Re: Application Insecurity --- Who is at Fault? Jeff Williams (Apr 06)
    - Re: Application Insecurity --- Who is at Fault? Michael Silk (Apr 06)
- SOS: Service Oriented Security Gunnar Peterson (Apr 06)
- RE: Application Insecurity --- Who is at Fault? Goertzel Karen (Apr 06)
  - Re: Application Insecurity --- Who is at Fault? Michael Silk (Apr 06)
- RE: Re: Application Insecurity --- Who is at Fault? Joel Kamentz (Apr 11)
  - Re: Re: Application Insecurity --- Who is at Fault? Dave Paris (Apr 11)
    - Re: Re: Application Insecurity --- Who is at Fault? ljknews (Apr 12)
  - RE: Re: Application Insecurity --- Who is at Fault? ljknews (Apr 11)
  - Re: Re: Application Insecurity --- Who is at Fault? Michael Silk (Apr 11)
- Re: Re: Application Insecurity --- Who is at Fault? Carl G. Alphonce (Apr 11)