Re: Secured Coding

[Gunnar Peterson <gunnar () arctecgroup net>]

so the question then is how do we security professionals catch up to where the
anasazis were 700 hundred years ago:

http://riskman.typepad.com/perilocity/2004/08/cliff_forts_vs_.html

-gp

Quoting Greenarrow 1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> As quoted in a recent email from the article, A Patch is a Patch, Antone
> Gonsalves, Editor for InternetWeek:  To read the entire article use the
> following link:
>
> http://update.internetweek.com/cgi-bin4/DM/y/ekcm0GPBjC0G4X0BbSA0At
>
> "Whether we're willing to accept it or not, bulletproof software
> doesn't exist. Some applications are more secure than others, and
> some vendors could do more to protect customers. But at the end of
> the day, we're responsible for our own safety. Build your defenses,
> as best you can, and then try not to worry. If it helps, just think
> how small your problems are in relation to the universe."
>
> I truly believe this as no matter how secured we make our programs there
> will always be someone to figure how to break it.
>
> Regards,
> George
> Greenarrow1
> InNetInvestigations-Forensics