Politech mailing list archives
Alberto Gonzales v. Google: the subpoena [priv]
From: Declan McCullagh <declan () well com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 11:52:30 -0800
The court documents in the case are here (scroll down): http://news.com.com/Feds+take+porn+fight+to+Google/2100-1030_3-6028701.html I wrote a FAQ that's up here: http://news.com.com/2100-1029_3-6029042.html Danny Sullivan has two good posts here: http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/060119-060352 http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/060120-105609Though I think he's a bit dismissive of the privacy interests of search engine users, which are explored in two editorials on Friday:
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2006/01/20/EDGEPGPHA61.DTL http://freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060120/OPINION01/601200328/1068/OPINIONPerhaps visits to a search engine can be thought of as somewhat akin to thumbing through a dictionary, or an encyclopedia, or a phone book. You'd want privacy in those cases, especially when doing financial or medical research.
But because the Supreme Court has said you don't have privacy when your records are held by others, the virtual equivalent of thumbing-through information is available to curious prosecutors or divorce attorneys. Thanks a lot, Supremes:
http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2006/01/do_no_evil_and_1.html -Declan _______________________________________________ Politech mailing list Archived at http://www.politechbot.com/ Moderated by Declan McCullagh (http://www.mccullagh.org/)
Current thread:
- Alberto Gonzales v. Google: the subpoena [priv] Declan McCullagh (Jan 23)