Politech mailing list archives
China, CALEA, and FBI Internet wiretapping demands [priv]
From: Declan McCullagh <declan () well com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 22:39:08 -0700
Previous Politech messages: http://www.politechbot.com/2005/10/24/wiretapping-rules-face/ http://www.politechbot.com/2005/10/24/making-universities-pay/ -------- Original Message --------Subject: Fwd: [chineseinternetresearch] giving them ideas, state subsidies, and having them manufacture the equipment ...
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 16:20:24 +0100 From: Greg Walton <jamyang () openflows org> To: Declan McCullagh <declan () well com> References: <093AD9CE-CBAD-43E2-8ED7-A625C9CB59C7 () openflows org> Declan, Below is thread from the Chinese Internet Research group that you may find relevant to your message, [Politech] Making universities pay for FBI surveillance, thank you very much FCC [priv]. All the best, Greg Walton http://gregwalton.civiblog.org Begin forwarded message:
From: Greg Walton <jamyang () openflows org> Date: 23 October 2005 08:11:36 BDT To: chineseinternetresearch () yahoogroups comSubject: Re: [chineseinternetresearch] giving them ideas, state subsidies, and having them manufacture the equipment ...Reply-To: chineseinternetresearch () yahoogroups com ... and that's the tip of the iceberg. Thank you, Anne. I think the article is perhaps more on topic that you suggest. CALEA originates in 1988, so your criticism is of the Bush administrations (plural, all 3 - er...so far). In China the PSB and the MSS is responsible for wiretapping, rather than the MII. With regards to the internationalization of CALEA as it relates to China in particular I would like to quote a summary of the respected privacy expert and Sun Microsystems employee Susan Landau, speaking at the 8th USENIX Security Symposium, August 23-26, 1999 in Washington, D.C., ----- . . . Landau is often asked for her opinion of what the future holds here. She feels there is a race going on. This race involves what the NSA and/or the FBI are trying to get away with, and what happens in Europe. If enough European competition starts taking away US business, then Congress may pass a certain set of laws. She also feels the FBI has a much more polarized view than the NSA; the NSA knows the game is lost as far as crypto goes, and it has a vested interest in the security of the US industry. A weak US computer industry makes the job of the NSA that much more difficult. Export controls that hamper the US computer industry are problematic precisely for that reason. She also feels that the currently admired practice of open source may change or influence the policy. If source code becomes public information, it will be harder to enforce export control, since the reason to do so will become less relevant. She ended her talk with a poignant story that took place shortly after CALEA passed. The FBI invited law enforcement from around the world to learn how to install and use similar wiretapping capabilities of digital switching technology. One of the police forces invited belonged to Hong Kong, which is now under Chinese jurisdiction; every year the State Department lists human-rights abuses from around the globe, and China is consistently at the top of this list. She ended with twin questions, "What are the technologies we're exporting, and what are the values we're exporting?" ------ There is nothing new in the following, its all in fact extracted from China's Golden Shield: As you are probably aware, "there is increasing concern that much of this surveillance technology is being exported, without any end-use criteria, to countries that flagrantly abuse the fundamental human rights of their citizens. Governments of countries with poorly developed infrastructures rely on industrialized countries to supply them with surveillance equipment. The transfer of surveillance technology from the developed to the developing world is now an important component of the post-Cold War arms industry. (8) With scant attention given to differing levels of human rights compliance, standardization across national borders is leading many to argue that a global architecture of electronic surveillance is emerging, with its origins in the US law enforcement community." As early as 1988, in a program known internally to the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) as "Operation Root Canal," US law enforcement officials demanded that telephone companies alter their equipment to facilitate the interception of messages. All but one of the major global telecom companies refused to contemplate altering their equipment. The exception was a Canadian company, Nortel Networks, which agreed to work closely with the FBI. More than 75% of North American Internet backbone traffic travels across Nortel Networks systems, and the company derives a significant proportion of its sales revenue from the US telecom market. .... Given Nortel’s early involvement in the development of standards in support of the CALEA legislation, it is natural that the first digital switch to reach market, and give service providers and vendors the ability to meet basic CALEA compliance, should be manufactured by Nortel. The sophisticated DMS Supernode switching technology is manufactured in China through a joint venture with the Chinese government known as GDNT (Guangdong Nortel). At the time, Nortel said of this technology transfer that it "will contribute immeasurably to the development of the Chinese telecommunications industry." In terms of funding, Nortel invested an extra US$37 million in GDNT (on top of funds agreed in a 1993 Memorandum of Understanding [MOU] with the state planning commission) – an investment that followed hot- on-the-heels of the announcement that the US government would pay equipment manufacturers compensation for the implementation of CALEA .... Of course, not mentioned in Golden Shield was that the establishment of GDNT was skillfully facilitated by the *alleged* double/triple agent Ms.Katrina Leung acting as a consultant for Nortel - while *allegedly* spying for China, while acting as a spy for the FBI. According to allegations, Ms. Leung had affairs with two FBI agents over a 20-year period while she was being paid $1.7-million (U.S.) by the FBI to spy on China. However, court documents allege that she was also spying for China and stole documents from the agents. During that period, Ms. Leung, whose code name was Parlor Maid, also ran a consulting business and her clients included Nortel, which paid her $1.2-million to help open markets in China. She was also active in the Republican Party and attended U.S. President George W. Bush's inauguration. "Mrs. Leung has never been an employee of Nortel Networks. Mrs. Leung was the president of a firm engaged by Nortel Networks in the early 1990s as a representative to assist us in the creation of a Chinese joint venture," said Tina Warren, a Nortel spokeswoman. "The firm was paid for its services and our business relationship with it terminated in 1996. Documents filed in court show that Nortel hired Ms. Leung's company, Merry Glory Ltd., in October, 1990, to help establish a joint venture in China: GDNT. Nortel was subpoenaed in January and handed over all documents relating to Ms. Leung. Ms.Leung's defense argued that the alleged double agent is loyal U.S. citizen: "It's not even the tip of the iceberg here," Levine said. "What we have here is a woman who pledged her allegiance to this country ... for many years she worked at the direction and the control of the FBI. "She was used by them to do what they wanted her to do. She acted as they told her to act." Levine said the FBI's handling of her client now looks like "absolute abuse." She mentioned that Smith, her handler, and another FBI agent had been sleeping with her. On 23 Oct 2005, at 07:21, Anne Stevenson-Yang wrote:Not on topic, but I can't resist noting that here goes the Bush Admin again, one-upping China in invasiveness and disregard for individual liberties. Imagine if MII tried to do this. I'm curious: who is planning to operate such a "network operations center," and what would its daily activities be? The core of the plan: "But the federal law would apply a high-tech approach, enabling law enforcement to monitor communications at campuses from remote locations at the turn of a switch. It would require universities to re-engineer their networks so that every Net access point would send all communications not directly onto the Internet, but first to a network operations center where the data packets could be stitched together into a single package for delivery to law enforcement, university officials said." Colleges Protest Call to Upgrade Online Systems - E-Mail This <javascript:document.emailThis.submit();> - Printer-Friendly</2005/10/23/technology/23college.html?ei=5094&en=82e2a961640ae05b&hp=&ex=1130040000&partner=homepage&pagewa nted=print> - Single-Page</2005/10/23/technology/23college.html?ei=5094&en=82e2a961640ae05b&hp=&ex=1130040000&partner=homepage&pagewa nted=all> - Reprints <#> - Save Article <#> By SAM DILLON<http://query.nytimes.com/search/query?ppds=bylL&v1=SAM %20DILLON&fdq=19960101&td=sysdate&sort=newest&ac=SAM% 20DILLON&inline=nyt-per>and STEPHEN LABATON<http://query.nytimes.com/search/query?ppds=bylL&v1=STEPHEN% 20LABATON&fdq=19960101&td=sysdate&sort=newest&ac=STEPHEN% 20LABATON&inline=nyt-per> Published: October 23, 2005 The federal government, vastly extending the reach of an 11-year- old law, is requiring hundreds of universities, online communications companies and cities to overhaul their Internet computer networks to make it easier for law enforcement authorities to monitor e-mail and other online communications. Skip to next paragraph <#secondParagraph> Phil Sears for The New York TimesLarry D. Conrad of Florida State University calls the order to upgradeInternet systems "overkill." [image: Related] Related Site: Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act <http://www.fcc.gov/calea/> (fcc.gov <http://fcc.gov>) The action, which the government says is intended to help catch terrorists and other criminals, has unleashed protests and the threat of lawsuits from universities, which argue that it will cost them at least $7 billion while doing little to apprehend lawbreakers. Because the government would have to win court orders before undertaking surveillance, the universities are not raising civil liberties issues. The order, issued by the Federal Communications Commission in August and first published in the Federal Register last week, extends the provisions of a 1994 wiretap law not only to universities, but also to libraries, airports providing wireless service and commercial Internet access providers. It also applies to municipalities that provide Internet access to residents, be they rural towns or cities like Philadelphia and San Francisco, which have plans to build their own Net access networks. So far, however, universities have been most vocal in their opposition. The 1994 law, the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act, requires telephone carriers to engineer their switching systems at their own cost so that federal agents can obtain easy surveillance access. Recognizing the growth of Internet-based telephone and other communications, the order requires that organizations like universities providing Internet access also comply with the law by spring 2007. The Justice Department requested the order last year, saying that new technologies like telephone service over the Internet were endangering law enforcement's ability to conduct wiretaps "in their fight against criminals, terrorists and spies." Justice Department officials, who declined to comment for this article, said in their written comments filed with the Federal Communications Commission that the new requirements were necessary to keep the 1994 law "viable in the face of the monumental shift of the telecommunications industry" and to enable law enforcement to "accomplish its mission in the face of rapidly advancing technology." The F.C.C. says it is considering whether to exempt educational institutions from some of the law's provisions, but it has not granted an extension for compliance. Lawyers for the American Council on Education, the nation's largest association of universities and colleges, are preparing to appeal the order before the United States<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/ countriesandterritories/unitedstates/index.html?inline=nyt-geo>Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Terry W. Hartle, a senior vice president of the council, said Friday. [...]
_______________________________________________ Politech mailing list Archived at http://www.politechbot.com/ Moderated by Declan McCullagh (http://www.mccullagh.org/)
Current thread:
- China, CALEA, and FBI Internet wiretapping demands [priv] Declan McCullagh (Oct 24)