Politech mailing list archives

FC: Decrypting password-protected Microsoft Word .gov documents?


From: Declan McCullagh <declan () well com>
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 12:55:15 -0500

The original site with the documents in question:
http://www.tsa.gov/public/theme_home6.jsp

For ease of downloading, I've placed them in a .tar.gz file here:
http://www.politechbot.com/docs/tsa.security.docs.121402.tar.gz

-Declan

----- Forwarded message from "Major Variola (ret)" -----

From: "Major Variola (ret)" 
Subject: [Gilmore, TSA, DoJ] Law Enforcement Agreement with Passenger
  Airports  (Password Protected Word Docs)
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 14:09:43 -0800
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; U)

MSWord password protection is undoubtably lame.  Anyone care to run
a cracker on these TSA LEO files?

http://129.33.119.130/public/theme_home6.jsp



General Information

                    This section features information pertaining to
security and law
                    enforcement operations that is suitable for public
distribution.

                    Law Enforcement Agreement with Passenger Airports

                         Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) - Open This
First!
                         (Password Protected Word 59KB)
                         New Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) for
Reimbursement
                         (Password Protected Word 504KB)
                         Instructions For Filling Out the MOA (Word
42KB) (Password
                         Protected Word 42KB)
                         Liability Information Sheet (Password
Protected)
                         Instructions for Billing TSA Under Local Law
Enforcement
                         MOAs/OTAs (Word 31KB)
                         Security Technology Deployment Office (STDO)
                         FSD Contact List (Excel 78KB)

(docs are at URL
http://129.33.119.130/public/interweb/assetlibrary/LEO_FAQ.doc etc.)

The files seem to be Word 9.0 and contain the following plaintext
(probably author): Todd Watanabe

Amusingly, the Liability doc is *not* encrypted, and contains the
largely boring:

Transportation Security Administration (TSA)

Agency Position on the Issue of Liability in Context of the Memoranda of
Agreement to reimburse for Local Law Enforcement presence:

Except as provided below, TSA and Local law enforcement agencies will be
responsible for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of their
respective employees.  Legal representation by the United States is
determined by the United States Department of Justice (USDOJ) on a
case-by-case basis.  TSA cannot guarantee that the United States will
provide legal representation to any Federal, State, or local law
enforcement officer.

Under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. '' 1346(b),
2671-2680, the exclusive remedy for the negligent or wrongful act or
omission of an employee of the United States, acting within the scope of
his or her employment, is an action against the United States.  A State
or local officer who has been deputized as a United States Marshal, or
is acting under the direct supervision or control of a Federal officer,
may be considered an employee of the United States if USDOJ certifies
that the individual defendant was acting within the scope of his or her
employment at the time of the incident giving rise to the suit.  The
United States can then be substituted for the employee as the sole
defendant with respect to any tort claims, and the individual employee
is thereby protected from suits in his official capacity.

Deputization by the U.S. Marshal Service cannot be accomplished
unilaterally by a local law enforcement authority.  State or local
agencies that wish to have their officers deputized for purposes of
working with TSA must apply through TSA.  For more information, please
contact Joseph J. DePalma, at (202)-493-1289.  NOTE:  This number should
not be used if you are interested in employment as a LEO.

Please note that the question of whether a state or local officer has
acted within the scope of federal employment is a factual issue that
must be determined on a case-by-case basis.
If USDOJ declines to certify that the individual defendant was acting
within the scope of federal employment, the officer may petition to the
court to find that he or she was so acting.  28 U.S.C. ' 2679(d)(3).
Otherwise, it is expected that the individuals employing State or local
agency will, in its discretion, assert such defenses as may be available
under applicable State law.  If an officer or agent undertakes any
negligent or willful acts outside the terms of the agreement between the
TSA and the local agency, liability for those acts will be the sole
responsibility of the agent or officer and agency involved.

A Federal officer or employee who engages in violations of Federal
constitutional law may be personally liable under Bivens v. Six Unknown
Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).  A
State or local officer or agent who engages in such violations may be
individually liable under 42 U.S.C. ' 1983.  Agents or officers may
request representation by USDOJ for civil suits against them in their
individual capacities for actions taken within the scope of employment
and under the terms of an agreement with TSA.  The determination whether
to grant representation will be made by USDOJ in accordance with 28
C.F.R. ' 50.15.  All requests for representation by USDOJ must be
coordinated through TSAs Office of Chief Counsel.

For more information, please contact Christian Jordan or Gregg Golden in
the TSA Chief Counsels office at:  (202) 493-1217.

----- End forwarded message -----



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list
You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice.
To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Like Politech? Make a donation here: http://www.politechbot.com/donate/
Recent CNET News.com articles: http://news.search.com/search?qÞclan
-------------------------------------------------------------------------


Current thread: