Politech mailing list archives
FC: Georgetown law "Movester" discussion TONIGHT 8 pm; filtering
From: Declan McCullagh <declan () well com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 17:20:35 -0500
[I did go to the pro-filtering press conference -- what fun! With all the talk of bestiality, hardcore Net-sex, and torture-snuff films on the Net, it was '95 all over again. When Donna Rice Hughes starts talking dirty and the Family Research Council waxes wroth over their soft-core "what I saw online" report, you know you're either watching the Playboy Channel or attending a press conference in the Longworth House Office Building. You can bet some of the groups -- oh, yes, you know who you are -- reused some of their scaremongery handouts from the CDA days. I took mostly B&W analog wideangle shots but some digital photos I'll put online later tonight. --Declan]
*********** Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 08:27:28 -0500 To: Declan McCullagh <declan () well com> From: Marc Rotenberg <rotenberg () epic org> Subject: Georgetown Law Tonight - "Movester" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-UIDL: 0e7219f2d875bef5f261aa44d646a935 Online Music: Intellectual Property or Internet Piracy? Moderator: Seth Waxman, Former Solicitor General WHEN: March 20, 2001 at 8:00 p.m. WHERE: The Moot Court Room Georgetown University Law Center 600 New Jersey Ave., N.W. , Washington, DC, 20001 WHAT: A panel discussion regarding music and video sharing and its implications for the music industry, internet use, privacy rights and copyright law. National attention on the Napster litigation attests to the widespread interest in the debate. Members of the panel will discuss this issue within the context of a hypothetical fact pattern fashioned by the GULC faculty. Confirmed Panelists Manus Cooney, Counsel for Napster; Former General Counsel for Judiciary Committee Johnny Deep, CEO of Aimster DeDe Ferrell, Vice President of Government Affairs at Viacom Mitch Glaser, RIIA, Senior Vice President of Legislative Affairs Sam Kaplan, Attorney in Napster Case Harry Katz, Senior Litigation Partner at Arnold & Porter Steven Levy, Technology Correspondent, Newsweek John Podesta, Former Chief of Staff for President Clinton Marc Rotenberg, Director of Electronic Privacy Information Center; GULC Adjunct Law Professor Noah Stone, Artists Against Piracy David Vladeck, Public Citizen; Former GULC professor For additional information please contact: Andy Cornblatt, Assistant Dean of Admissions, (202) 662-9051 THE MOUSE THAT ROARED? The Facts: Movester Rules Technical advances in digital recording have transformed the video-recorder from a means of recording grainy, out-of-focus home movies suitable only for showing family members in one's living room to high-definition, high-quality, perfectly-colored replicas of what one sees on television or in a movie theater. Moms and Dads are delighted to have a life-like, permanent recording of junior's first steps. But the movie industry is petrified. It was bad enough when pirates with hand-held, first-generation video cameras could sneak into first run movies and sell poor quality copies on the street corner to unsuspecting bargain-hunters. But these new cameras present a piracy problem that, at least to hear industry's side of the story, threatens it with economic ruin. Anyone with a camera worth a few hundred dollars can make a nearly-exact replica of a first run movie, and with basic computer equipment, convert that movie into a digital file that can be transmitted over the Internet at the click of a mouse. What makes the downloading and transfer easy is a new software program -- Movester -- that allows virtually anyone with Movester on his or her computer to download and transfer movie files via the Internet to any other computer loaded with Movester. Even more amazing, Movester permits anyone who has loaded the software on his or her computer to search for movie titles on virtually any other computer that also has Movester loaded on it. The only limitations are that, because of their size, the files must be segmented into sections of no more than 20 minutes duration, each file must be separately labeled, each segment generally takes fifteen to twenty minutes to download, and most people can view the movie only on their computer monitor, not their television. The same technology can also be used to download and swap television shows, and the networks are just as terrified as the movie studios. The developers of Movester -- Jack and Tom Technonerd -- have announced that they intend to place the software on the Internet, where it will be available free of charge to anyone who cares to download it. When asked whether they are worried that Movester will encourage people to pirate movies and television shows, the Technonerds deny that that is their intention. They say, however, that "art should be freely available to the people," but they doubt "that anyone would bother using Movester to download a full, feature-length movie because of the time and effort" involved. They concede, however, that people might download and swap their favorite movie scenes, like the final tear-jerking scene in Casablanca or the chase scene in Mad Max (their personal favorite), and they "hope that Movester will be used for that purpose." When asked whether Movester could be used to pirate television shows, the Technonerds responded by inquiring "why the networks would care, since everyone watches TV in their own homes." Perhaps because they have a sense of humor, the Technonerds have scheduled the unveiling of their Internet site for April 1, 2001. They are considering whether to accept paid advertising on their site, since they have incurred substantial expenses developing Movester but do not otherwise stand to make a penny for their labors. Needless to say, movie moguls and television executives are up in arms about Movester and are meeting day and night with their high-priced lawyers trying to decide what, if anything, they should do. The Problem: Movester's Counsel: Assume that you have been hired by the Technonerds to advise them. They have a number of questions: 1) Can they go to jail for putting Movester on the Internet? 2) Would they be better off not accepting advertising, and hence can rightly say that they are not profiting from Movester? 3) If advertising is okay, should they charge a user fee of some sort, so they can make some big bucks? 4) If they are sued, are they likely to have to pay significant damages (since they only have a few dollars between them, this may not be a serious concern)? Counsel to Spielberger-Lukas-Panks Movie Studio: Assume that you've been retained by the Hollywood's most profitable studio three weeks before Movester's launch date; the studio has several questions: 1) Is there any way to enjoin Movester's launch? 2) If not, should we sue right away? Before Movester is posted? Or should we wait and see what happens? 3) What other steps can we take now to avoid the pirating of our materials? 4) If we win litigation against Movester, do we have any hope of recovering damages? Counsel to CNM News Channel: Assume that you've been hired by the nation's preeminent news network to advise it on the impact of Movester. CNM is especially worried about its footage of breaking news, since CNM often beats the other networks to the punch and airs footage of the disaster, war, plane crash or other tragedy du jour hours or even days before its competitors. CNM isn't worried about other networks pirating its material. It is, however, fearful that its competitive edge will be seriously blunted if its footage is widely available on the Internet before the network has had an opportunity to exploit it fully. CNM wants your advice about what, if anything, it can do to protect itself from Movester. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list You may redistribute this message freely if it remains intact. To subscribe, visit http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- FC: Georgetown law "Movester" discussion TONIGHT 8 pm; filtering Declan McCullagh (Mar 20)