Politech mailing list archives
FC: 2600 Australia assails "cybercrime" legislation
From: Declan McCullagh <declan () well com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 21:19:18 -0400
[Hey, whatever happened to ASCII text and HTML versions? --Declan] ----- Forwarded message from Grant Bayley <gbayley () ausmac net> ----- From: Grant Bayley <gbayley () ausmac net> Subject: 2600 Australia Cybercrime Bill 2001 Inquiry Submission To: <link () www anu edu au> Cc: Declan McCullagh <declan () well com>, <macki () 2600 com>, <cryptography () wasabisystems com> Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 17:01:40 +1000 (EST) 2600 Australia would like to announce the public release of its submission to the Australian Senate Legal and Constitutional Legislation Commitee inquiry into the provisions of the Cybercrime Bill, 2001. http://www.2600.org.au/Cybercrime-Submission.pdf (121k) http://www.2600.org.au/Cybercrime-Submission.doc (91k) (This release has been authorised by the Secretary to the Committee as at 24th July, 2001) Included here is the Executive Summary: a. 2600 Australia believes the term "cybercrime" is so broadly defined and so frequently misdefined that legislation such as the Cybercrime Bill, 2001 will fail to achieve the desired result if only through failure to address some issues and through the addition of unnecessary complexity to existing laws. b. 2600 Australia believes that a number of parts of the Cybercrime Bill, 2001 place in grave danger the robust debate, discussion and disclosure that the computer security industry relies so heavily upon. c. 2600 Australia believes that a number of parts of the Cybercrime Bill, 2001 will unintentionally place a significant number of computer security industry professionals at risk because of poorly defined or overly broad definitions of certain acts, objects and intentions. d. 2600 Australia believes that a number of parts of the Cybercrime Bill, 2001 place in grave danger the common law privilege against self incrimination. e. 2600 Australia believes that an alternative response to the perceived threat of "cybercrime" is required, including but not limited to additional training for law enforcement, more rigorous ACCC scrutiny of security claims made in respect of products and services and the formation of a national body to oversee computer security matters. f. For these reasons and others as discussed below, 2600 Australia canot support the passage of the Cybercrime Bill, 2001 in its current or any substantially similar form. Grant Bayley ------------------------------------------------------- Grant Bayley gbayley () ausmac net -Admin @ AusMac Archive, Wiretapped.net, 2600 Australia www.ausmac.net www.wiretapped.net www.2600.org.au ------------------------------------------------------- ----- End forwarded message ----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice. To subscribe, visit http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- FC: 2600 Australia assails "cybercrime" legislation Declan McCullagh (Jul 24)