Politech mailing list archives
FC: U.S. war on drugs targets technology, by Lewis Koch
From: Declan McCullagh <declan () well com>
Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2001 21:07:02 -0500
Law enforcement officials have been complaining about technology hampering the WoSPIDs (war on some politically-incorrect drugs) for a while:
http://www.politechbot.com/p-01561.html http://www.politechbot.com/p-00474.html http://www.politechbot.com/p-00533.htmlBTW, some folks (rightfully) complained about TANSTAAFL; one explanation is here:
http://www.ucc.ie/cgi-bin/acronym?TANSTAAFL -Declan ********** From: "Chris Fedeli" <cafedeli () erols com> To: "Declan McCullagh" <declan () well com> Subject: War On Drugs Targets Tech Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 16:28:00 -0500 Declan, this looks like a matter of interest for politech readers. - Chris ------------------------- http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/zd/20010202/tc/war_on_drugs_targets_tech_1.html Friday February 02 01:16 PM EST War On Drugs Targets Tech By Lewis Z. Koch Special To Interactive Week, Interactive Week The new scapegoat for the failed War on Drugs is, of all things, technology. The 120-page December 2000 International Crime Threat Assessment report - created by basically every federal law enforcement agency in the U.S. - is riddled with examples of how computer technology has advanced the cause of national and international crime. Modern telecommunications and information systems, state-of-the-art communications equipment, computers - they're all to blame. What the report fails to squarely acknowledge is that the oil that fuels organized crime in the U.S. and abroad, including terrorist organizations, is profit from the trade in illegal drugs bound for the U.S. - billions of dollars in profit from drug sales that enhance the power of international crime cartels and their ability to corrupt police, judges and governmental officials from Tijuana to Tanzania. "Through the use of computers, international criminals have an unprecedented capability to obtain, process and protect information and sidestep law enforcement investigations," the report stated. "They can use the interactive capabilities of advanced computers and telecommunications systems to plot marketing strategies for drugs and other illicit commodities, to find the most efficient routes and methods for smuggling and moving money in the financial system and to create false trails for law enforcement or banking security." It goes on to assert: "More threateningly, some criminal organizations appear to be adept at using technology for counterintelligence purposes and for tracking law enforcement activities." In other words, it's not our flawed drug policy that's to blame - it's new technology. Where All This Began In 1937, Harry J. Anslinger, six years into his 30-year-reign as director at the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, testified before the U.S. Senate on behalf of the "Marihuana Tax Act." This delighted the Hearst newspapers, which, lacking a real war to increase newspaper sales, launched an all-out battle against demon marijuana. Here are a few excerpts from Anslinger's sworn testimony. Clearly, our drug policy traces its roots to reasoning that was as racist and alarmist as it was wildly inaccurate: "There are 100,000 total marijuana smokers in the U.S., and most are Negroes, Hispanics, Filipinos and entertainers. Their Satanic music, jazz and swing, result from marijuana use. This marijuana can cause white women to seek sexual relations with Negroes, entertainers and any others." [...] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list You may redistribute this message freely if it remains intact. To subscribe, visit http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- FC: U.S. war on drugs targets technology, by Lewis Koch Declan McCullagh (Feb 04)