Politech mailing list archives

FC: Net-gambling bill is way for special interests to get favors


From: Declan McCullagh <declan () well com>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 11:18:02 -0400



http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A33353-2000May30.html

Online Gambling Bill a Web of Industry Favors

By Dan Morgan
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, May 31, 2000 ; A03

The Internet Gambling Prohibition bill was supposed to do just what its name implied: curb the explosion of online gambling. But as the bill heads into the final stretch in Congress, it has become a magnet for favors to gambling interests.

First, there is the $14 billion a year parimutuel horse racing industry, which would get a share of the proceeds from bets placed on a home computer. Wielding influence through its nationwide network of tracks, breeders and horse farms, the industry has won concessions that the Justice Department says would "expand gambling opportunities."

That exception has set off a frenzy among other groups--from Indian tribes to states with lotteries--clamoring for the same privileges. Before the Senate passed the measure in November, the American Greyhound Track Operators won a similar exception for dog tracks. Then in the House, Rep. Bill McCollum (R-Fla.) went to bat for the state's jai alai industry--and jai alai was added to the list.

As a result, several Christian right organizations have pulled their support. And the anti-gambling bill--once a seemingly straightforward effort to clamp down on a fast-growing phenomenon--has become bogged down in the war of clashing interests, with groups from professional sports leagues to Internet service providers to credit card companies angling to protect their interests.

The established casino industry has been a prime mover behind the bill because it would curb the
online upstarts the industry fears could cut into its profits.

But after unanimously passing the Senate last year and winning approval in the House Judiciary Committee in April, the legislation is "in trouble," one aide to the House Republican leadership said.
No date has been set for floor action.

The biggest current dispute involves state lotteries, which do not sell tickets online but want to be able to compete in cyberspace. In a bid to retain support from Christian groups, the House Judiciary Committee put severe restrictions on state lotteries before it approved the bill.

Lobbyists for the online companies that would handle this business have mobilized the National Governors Association and individual governors to ask House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) and other top House Republicans for help. They have urged Congress to let states decide for themselves
whether to permit the use of the Internet for local lottery operations.

[...]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
POLITECH -- the moderated mailing list of politics and technology
To subscribe, visit http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------


Current thread: