RE: Penetration Testing Services

[Khalid Lakdawala <k.lakdawala () arbahcapital com>]

Dear,

Kindly note that external penetration test is usually driven by couple of factor ( Compliance, Regulatory, SOX, PCI DSS 
etc most probably for financial system / Privacy protection)

If there is no regulatory or compliance requirement within your company and if you don’t have any financial systems/ or 
system which holds personal information directly exposed to external network ( Public network), then internal review 
will suffice and there won't be any need for external test.

You should note that the internal Auditor understand the RISK and have proper understanding of VA/PT and Application 
testing, let me give you brief how can you have some level of comfort if your system are Secures.

Take an example you have web site which collects and Stores personal information from customers and stores this in 
backend database.

In such scnerio your internal Audit team should ensure following controls.

1. Security Architecture : Ensuring that the Web system and application / DB are on different segment protected by 
firewall
2. Configuration review of Firewalls/ Network devices to ensure only required traffic is permitted from external network
3. System Hardening: Ensure your web server OS and Web components ( IIS/Apache ) is hardened.(including AV and patches)
4. Vulnerability Scan : HERE YOUR NESSUS WILL BE USED
5. Web Application Testing: Here you have to cover some manual and auto test for SQL Injection , CCX, Session 
management etc : You can refer OWASP web site for details, most organization atleast cover Top test vulnerability. ( 
you can use tools like PAROX / BURP/ Metasploit etc)
6. You need to manually review and Harden the backend database ( Oracle/ SQL etc)
7. Review of Audit logs for incidents ( IPS logs, System logs etc)- This is option security control to understand the 
past attach pattern.
If your internal Auditor has capability to achieve 80% in each of these then I think it should suffice.


Regards
Khalid - CISO





-----Original Message-----
From: listbounce () securityfocus com [mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com] On Behalf Of MAlMozaiyn () alfransi com 
sa
Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2010 2:36 PM
To: cribbar
Cc: listbounce () securityfocus com; pen-test () securityfocus com
Subject: Re: Penetration Testing Services

Hi there,

Tools, like Nessus, are vulnerability-oriented. They can point at
vulnerabilities. Of course, in some cases these are only false-positives.
However, what you need to be aware of is not "only" vulnerabilities. This
needs to be extended to cover Risks.

What a third-party MUST provide is a risk-driven report that shows real
vulnerabilities in your systems and are very relevant to your environment
and makes sense to be fixed.

In addition to the above, penetration testing process is not limited to
scanning the network. As the name indicates, it is to potentially attempt
to penetrate resources for testing (assessment) purposes.

To conclude, Nessus, as well as other tools are a great additions to the
penetration testing practice. It is not the full picture, and at the same
time, missing these factors is a noticeable depreciation.




Have a good day,
Mohammed Almozaiyn, CISSP, GCIH
Senior Security Analyst
———————————————————
* malmozaiyn () alfransi com sa
———————————————————



  From:       cribbar <crib.bar () hotmail co uk>

  To:         pen-test () securityfocus com

  Date:       03-08-2010 09:23 AM

  Subject:    Penetration Testing Services

  Sent by:    listbounce () securityfocus com







Penetration Testing Community - I am interested in getting an expert
response
to a discussion that keeps raising up in our company.

First off, I have some basic IT/Infrastructure knowledge, but I am most
definitely not up to the level of a penetration tester (please bare this in
mind with your responses).

Basically, our company has an internal IT Security section, who has
recently
purchased some of the popular vulnerability assessment software such as
Nessus. They are running quarterly scans using Nessus across an IP range
and
producing a report to senior management on the types of security holes in
the Network and how they can be fixed (and more importantly to management
how much it is going to cost to fix).

I’ve spent a couple of hours on the Nessus website looking at the types of
“vulnerability” it will catch, and it seems to cover a whole array of
topics
and security issues. This leads to the inevitable comment from senior
management, if we have an IT Security section who are using the most common
vulnerability scanning / penetration testing tools –what is the point in
investing significant $$$ in buying in a 3rd party to do exactly the same?


I fully appreciate that penetration testing is an area of high skill, as a
3rd party you provide an independent neutral security review, it takes
years
to master the topic, and once mastered you need to stay up to date with all
the current vulnerabilities and exploits, and it is your guy’s area of
expertise, whereas a security admin is not specific to penetration testing.
And let’s be honest, anyone can essentially download a user friendly piece
of software and click “scan” or whatever and produce a report listing
problems.

However, in order to be in defence of the pen testing community during such
discussions, I have a few questions….

• How do you as penetration testers, portray the importance of this
independent check to future potential clients? Is this independence really
that important?

• What broadly speaking do you as professional penetration testers bring
additional to a nessus scan during the services you provide? If there are
categories of security issues/vulnerabilities that you can flag up doing
one
of your penetration tests that Nessus wont - that would be incredibly
useful
to know, and I’d love to be able to identify the limitations of Nessus
scans
but I am a bit out of my depth to be able to do so.

• I trawled through the archives of this forum and others, and it seems
some
pen testing companies use the exact same tools such as nmap and nessus, and
in some cases simply pass across a Nessus report for a specific IP range
and
that’s the report they use. This to me sounds a complete rip off, and I
can’t see the benefit. So where is the added benefit in having an internal
security guy run nessus, and paying a 3rd party pen tester x amount of $$$
money to do exactly the same? Why not just stick with the internal guy? Or
am I missing something? I really would appreciate real examples of whereby
just running Nessus is simply not enough as it wont catch a, b and c!

I look forward to your comments.

--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Penetration-Testing-Services-tp29324189p29324189.html
Sent from the Penetration Testing mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is sponsored by: Information Assurance Certification Review Board

Prove to peers and potential employers without a doubt that you can
actually do a proper penetration test. IACRB CPT and CEPT certs require a
full practical examination in order to become certified.

http://www.iacertification.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------


ARBAH CAPITAL
7th Floor, Samic Building, Al Khaleej Road, Shatee District,
Corniche, P .O. Box 8807, Dammam 31492, Saudi Arabia.
URL: www.arbahcapital.com.   Email: info () arbahcapital com

The contents of this email, including all related responses, files and attachments transmitted with it are intended 
solely for the use of the individual/entity to whom/which they are addressed, and may contain confidential and/or 
legally privileged information. This Email may not be disclosed or forwarded to anyone else without authorization from 
the originator of this Email. If you have received this Email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete 
all copies from your system.

Please note that the views or opinions presented in this email are those of the author and may not necessarily 
represent those of Arbah Capital. The recipient should check this Email and any attachments for the presence of any 
viruses. Arbah Capital accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus or error transmitted by this Email