Penetration Testing mailing list archives
RE: Pay per use pentesting tool?
From: "Alex Eden" <Alex.Eden () senet-int com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:22:23 -0400
WebInspect, before acquired by HP, required specifying upon installation of the software/license what networks you would like to scan. A month ago we purchased their 1-month license (a difficult and lengthy procedure), and we had open range. We could scan anything. -----Original Message----- From: listbounce () securityfocus com [mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com] On Behalf Of Mike Duncan Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 3:44 PM To: natron Cc: Ramki B Ramakrishnan; pen-test () securityfocus com Subject: Re: Pay per use pentesting tool? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Isn't Appscan's licensing model against this very thing? You can only specify upon installation of the software/license what networks you would like to scan. Unless I am missing a point by their sales staff...let me know if so. Mike Duncan ISSO, Application Security Specialist Government Contractor with STG, Inc. NOAA :: National Climatic Data Center 151 Patton Ave. Asheville, NC 28801-5001 mike.duncan () noaa gov 828.271.4289 natron wrote: | Don't most of the automated web application testing tools follow this | model? I know IBM's AppScan does. | | On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Ramki B Ramakrishnan | <bramkie () gmail com> wrote: |> Thinking out of the box I wonder if there are any pay-per-use pentesting |> tools, typically this could be used by consultants who are not into full |> time testing. Are there any tools currently available in this model?. |> |> Thanks |> Ramki |> |> |> |> |> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ |> This list is sponsored by: Cenzic |> |> Top 5 Common Mistakes in |> Securing Web Applications |> Get 45 Min Video and PPT Slides |> |> www.cenzic.com/landing/securityfocus/hackinar |> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ |> |> | | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | This list is sponsored by: Cenzic | | Top 5 Common Mistakes in | Securing Web Applications | Get 45 Min Video and PPT Slides | | www.cenzic.com/landing/securityfocus/hackinar | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIaTeGnvIkv6fg9hYRAmB8AJ99VIeU17WkUy1EFbh5wdilpJp2ugCfdcP2 DcJagpZqz8vaxYb0ujU3j/g= =dtJY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This list is sponsored by: Cenzic Top 5 Common Mistakes in Securing Web Applications Get 45 Min Video and PPT Slides www.cenzic.com/landing/securityfocus/hackinar ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This list is sponsored by: Cenzic Top 5 Common Mistakes in Securing Web Applications Get 45 Min Video and PPT Slides www.cenzic.com/landing/securityfocus/hackinar ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Pay per use pentesting tool? Ramki B Ramakrishnan (Jun 30)
- Re: Pay per use pentesting tool? natron (Jun 30)
- Re: Pay per use pentesting tool? Mike Duncan (Jun 30)
- RE: Pay per use pentesting tool? Alex Eden (Jun 30)
- Re: Pay per use pentesting tool? natron (Jun 30)
- Re: Pay per use pentesting tool? Mike Duncan (Jun 30)
- Re: Pay per use pentesting tool? Trygve Aasheim (Jun 30)
- RE: Pay per use pentesting tool? Sergio Castro (Jun 30)
- Re: Pay per use pentesting tool? natron (Jun 30)