Penetration Testing mailing list archives
RE: The cat came and stayed..
From: "Erin Carroll" <amoeba () amoebazone com>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:35:26 -0700
I kept hoping that this subject would work its way around to a pen-test-related issue but this seems to have devolved into a routing debug issue. Further posts on this subject, unless pen-test related, will be rejected. -- Erin Carroll Moderator SecurityFocus pen-test list "Do Not Taunt Happy-Fun Ball"
-----Original Message----- From: listbounce () securityfocus com [mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com] On Behalf Of Buz Dale Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 3:53 PM To: WALI Cc: pen-test () securityfocus com Subject: Re: The cat came and stayed.. I'm going to ask some questions to clarify my spotty networking knowledge. Essentially, you have routers connecting buildings "A" and "B" and when you turn off the routing and make them layer two devices (Bridging mode) things work as expected. To me this implicates a layer three problem. Perhaps an IP conflict with the router, a machine masquerading as the gateway (perhaps responding to arps for the gateway ip) or a bad route. I would start looking at layer three misconfigurations. Maybe a dhcp server is giving a bad gateway or somesuch. What happens when you traceroute between the networks? Do you have extra hops? Are there specific places with time lags? Thanks, Buz On 3/28/07, WALI <hkhasgiwale () gmail com> wrote:By the time you have finished reading this, I am sure youwould havecome across the most fascinating networking issue haunted by our friendly ghost Casper. With reference to my earlier thread, (Re: When cat comeschasing...),this time the cat came and stayed. Having exploited most of my resources , I finally decided to involve our ISP hoping that this would be the end of it...but it wasn't supposed to be that way. So, to cut a long story short, ISP had provided us withEoATM 100 mbpslink between two locations, say A and B. But, since the line was given, we felt that we were not only having intermittent problems that required switch reset but alsofelt that wewere not getting the right speed and the data transferrates(FTP copyand other stuff) was really not befitting a 100Mbps link. In order to make sure, this time the ISP guy brought someequipment toour premises and confirmed that speed at Layer 2 is indeed 100. There are two cisco routers across Sites A and B and two media changers at each end converting Fiber to UTP. Mediaconverters are also set at 100Mbps.Now a strange thing is that when we configure the tworouters (Site Aand B) in 'bridging' mode and start data transfer across, the speed becomes incrementally fast ( which should be taken as normal at all times). There is also another 100Mbps link provided by thesame ISP tous between Buildings A and C, which works just fine, as itshould be.The moment we enable our routers at Site A and B in Routingmode, Weget to suffer delays and all data transfers slow down, without bringing any core/edge switches into the picture. Various things have been done to reach some conclusion: 1. Ip Router configurations has been reset and put to bare minimum needed with ipcef enabled, all QoS commands disabled. 2. Configurations has been checked with all combinations of Speed Auto/100 FullDuplex/Auto with best results coming out of FD/100 but still far below satisfactory. 3. Equipment which serves between Site A and C has been temporarily put between Site A and B, with same non-satisfactory results. 4. Earthing issues/Electrical disruption in the Room whererouters arelocated has been looked into. Routers on both sides havebeen changedto rule out hardware issues. We also did a test on the line by bringing our routers into another room ruling out someelectrical disturbance of any sort.Seems like, at Layer 2, despite being showing us full100mbps, Layer 3and above transfers are unable to provide the required service. Opening applications across the two buildings is very slowas most ofour servers reside at Site A with user base at Site B. Currently this ISP engineer has provided us with a patchedpure fibrelink between Sites A and B without any intervening ISP equipment in between and we have connected our two core switches in bothbuildingsdirectly to the UTP interface of Media converter but that's not the permanent solution. ISP Engineer is also trying hard to find this ghost problem. He says that he has found no problems on hisside andthe only thing that comes in the middle is a MPLS enabledrouter. But even he is a bit baffled.What else can we look at? Thanks for taking time to read this whole ghost story. If you have read this all, I am sure you won't stop thinking ;) At 12:57 AM 3/24/2007 +0100, Antonin Kral wrote:Hi Wali, * WALI <hkhasgiwale () gmail com> [2007-03-24 00:50] wrote:Crazy Solution: I take out any patch cable andre-inserts it, theproblem gets resolved. I reset any switch, the problem gets resolved. I disconnect any uplink cable between thefour switchesor do a ARP reset thru command line, the problem getsresolved for couple of hours or even days.This sounds like problems with spanning tree in thenetwork. Do yourun STP? Take a look at the topology changes reported bystp. Or onemore thing - this could happen because of over-fulling CAM (switching) tables of particular switch. Check if you arenot runningout of memory somewhere. Cheers, Antonin------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Need to secure your web apps? Cenzic Hailstorm finds vulnerabilities fast. Click the link to buy it, try it or download Hailstorm for FREE.http://www.cenzic.com/products_services/download_hailstorm.php?camp=701600000008bOW------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Need to secure your web apps? Cenzic Hailstorm finds vulnerabilities fast. Click the link to buy it, try it or download Hailstorm for FREE.http://www.cenzic.com/products_services/download_hailstorm.php?camp=701600000008bOW-------------------------------------------------------------------------- Buz Dale buz.dale () usg edu IT Security Specialist 1-888-875-3697 (In GA) 1-706-583-2005 Office of Information and Instructional Technology University System of Georgia GMT -5:00 -------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Need to secure your web apps? Cenzic Hailstorm finds vulnerabilities fast. Click the link to buy it, try it or download Hailstorm for FREE. http://www.cenzic.com/products_services/download_hailstorm.php ?camp=701600000008bOW -------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Need to secure your web apps? Cenzic Hailstorm finds vulnerabilities fast. Click the link to buy it, try it or download Hailstorm for FREE. http://www.cenzic.com/products_services/download_hailstorm.php?camp=701600000008bOW ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- When cat comes chasing... WALI (Mar 23)
- Re: When cat comes chasing... Roland Dobbins (Mar 23)
- Re: When cat comes chasing... Matthew Leeds (Mar 24)
- Re: When cat comes chasing... Philosophil (Mar 27)
- Re: When cat comes chasing... WALI (Mar 27)
- Re: When cat comes chasing... Antonin Kral (Mar 24)
- The cat came and stayed.. WALI (Mar 28)
- Re: The cat came and stayed.. Roland Dobbins (Mar 28)
- Re: The cat came and stayed.. Buz Dale (Mar 28)
- RE: The cat came and stayed.. Erin Carroll (Mar 28)
- The cat came and stayed.. WALI (Mar 28)