Penetration Testing mailing list archives

RE: The cat came and stayed..


From: "Erin Carroll" <amoeba () amoebazone com>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:35:26 -0700

I kept hoping that this subject would work its way around to a
pen-test-related issue but this seems to have devolved into a routing debug
issue. Further posts on this subject, unless pen-test related, will be
rejected.

--
Erin Carroll
Moderator
SecurityFocus pen-test list
"Do Not Taunt Happy-Fun Ball"  

-----Original Message-----
From: listbounce () securityfocus com 
[mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com] On Behalf Of Buz Dale
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 3:53 PM
To: WALI
Cc: pen-test () securityfocus com
Subject: Re: The cat came and stayed..

I'm going to ask some questions to clarify my spotty 
networking knowledge. Essentially,  you have routers 
connecting buildings "A" and "B" and when you turn off the 
routing and make them layer two devices (Bridging mode) 
things work as expected.  To me this implicates a layer three problem.
Perhaps an IP conflict with the router, a machine 
masquerading as the gateway (perhaps responding to arps for 
the gateway ip) or a bad route. I would start looking at 
layer three misconfigurations.  Maybe a dhcp server is giving 
a bad gateway or somesuch.  What happens when you traceroute 
between the networks?  Do you have extra hops? Are there 
specific places with time lags?

Thanks,
Buz

On 3/28/07, WALI <hkhasgiwale () gmail com> wrote:

By the time you have finished reading this, I am sure you 
would have 
come across the most fascinating networking issue haunted by our 
friendly ghost Casper.

With reference to my earlier thread, (Re: When cat comes 
chasing...), 
this time the cat came and stayed. Having exploited most of my 
resources , I finally decided to involve our ISP hoping that this 
would be the end of it...but it wasn't supposed to be that way.

So, to cut a long story short, ISP had provided us with 
EoATM 100 mbps 
link between two locations, say A and B.

But, since the line was given, we felt that we were not only having 
intermittent problems that required switch reset but also 
felt that we 
were not getting the right speed and the data transfer 
rates(FTP copy 
and other
stuff) was really not befitting a 100Mbps link.

In order to make sure, this time the ISP guy brought some 
equipment to 
our premises and confirmed that speed at Layer 2 is indeed 100.

There are two cisco routers across Sites A and B and two media 
changers at each end converting Fiber to UTP. Media 
converters are also set at 100Mbps.

Now a strange thing is that when we configure the two 
routers (Site A 
and
B) in 'bridging' mode and start data transfer across, the speed 
becomes incrementally fast ( which should be taken as normal at all 
times). There is also another 100Mbps link provided by the 
same ISP to 
us between Buildings A and  C, which works just fine, as it 
should be.

The moment we enable our routers at Site A and B in Routing 
mode, We 
get to suffer delays and all data transfers slow down, without 
bringing any core/edge switches into the picture.

Various things have been done to reach some conclusion:

1. Ip Router configurations has been reset and put to bare minimum 
needed with ipcef enabled, all QoS commands disabled.
2. Configurations has been checked with all combinations of Speed 
Auto/100 FullDuplex/Auto with best results coming out of FD/100 but 
still far below satisfactory.
3. Equipment which serves between Site A and C has been temporarily 
put between Site A and B, with same non-satisfactory results.
4. Earthing issues/Electrical disruption in the Room where 
routers are 
located has been looked into. Routers on both sides have 
been changed 
to rule out hardware issues. We also did a test on the line by 
bringing our routers into another room ruling out some 
electrical disturbance of any sort.

Seems like, at Layer 2, despite being showing us full 
100mbps, Layer 3 
and above transfers are unable to provide the required service. 
Opening applications across the two buildings is very slow 
as most of 
our servers reside at Site A with user base at Site B.

Currently this ISP engineer has provided us with a patched 
pure fibre 
link between Sites A and B without any intervening ISP equipment in 
between and we have connected our two core switches in both 
buildings 
directly to the UTP interface of Media converter but that's not the 
permanent solution. ISP Engineer is also trying hard to find this 
ghost problem. He says that he has found no problems on his 
side and 
the only thing that comes in the middle is a MPLS enabled 
router. But even he is a bit baffled.

What else can we look at?

Thanks for taking time to read this whole ghost story. If you have 
read this all, I am sure you won't stop thinking ;)

At 12:57 AM 3/24/2007 +0100, Antonin Kral wrote:
Hi Wali,

* WALI <hkhasgiwale () gmail com> [2007-03-24 00:50] wrote:
Crazy Solution: I take out any patch cable and 
re-inserts it, the 
problem gets resolved. I reset any switch, the problem gets 
resolved. I disconnect any uplink cable between the 
four switches 
or do a ARP reset thru command line, the problem gets 
resolved for couple of hours or even days.

This sounds like problems with spanning tree in the 
network. Do you 
run STP? Take a look at the topology changes reported by 
stp. Or one 
more thing - this could happen because of over-fulling CAM 
(switching) tables of particular switch. Check if you are 
not running 
out of memory somewhere.

    Cheers,

        Antonin


---------------------------------------------------------------------
---
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic

Need to secure your web apps?
Cenzic Hailstorm finds vulnerabilities fast.
Click the link to buy it, try it or download Hailstorm for FREE.


http://www.cenzic.com/products_services/download_hailstorm.php?camp=7
01600000008bOW

---------------------------------------------------------------------
---



----------------------------------------------------------------------
--
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic

Need to secure your web apps?
Cenzic Hailstorm finds vulnerabilities fast.
Click the link to buy it, try it or download Hailstorm for FREE.


http://www.cenzic.com/products_services/download_hailstorm.php?camp=70
1600000008bOW

----------------------------------------------------------------------
--




-- 
Buz Dale                                buz.dale () usg edu
IT Security Specialist              1-888-875-3697 (In GA)
1-706-583-2005
Office of Information and Instructional Technology University 
System of Georgia GMT -5:00

--------------------------------------------------------------
----------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic

Need to secure your web apps?
Cenzic Hailstorm finds vulnerabilities fast.
Click the link to buy it, try it or download Hailstorm for FREE.

http://www.cenzic.com/products_services/download_hailstorm.php
?camp=701600000008bOW
--------------------------------------------------------------
----------



------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic

Need to secure your web apps?
Cenzic Hailstorm finds vulnerabilities fast.
Click the link to buy it, try it or download Hailstorm for FREE.

http://www.cenzic.com/products_services/download_hailstorm.php?camp=701600000008bOW
------------------------------------------------------------------------


Current thread: